Content
92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a tight, well-structured, actionable checklist that assumes Claude's competence and embeds the validation steps the workflow-clarity rubric rewards, with no padding and appropriate sectioning.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is a lean checklist with no padding and no explanation of concepts Claude already knows; every line earns its place, matching the 'lean and efficient; assumes Claude's competence' anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Checks are concrete and specific, citing real APIs and commands (redact_params(), requires_approval(), tempfile, is_char_boundary(), 'grep impl LlmProvider for'), giving mostly executable guidance; held at 4 rather than 5 because it is guidance rather than copy-paste-ready code, which suits a checklist skill but leaves minor gaps versus the fully-executable anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | As a single-purpose validation checklist it is unambiguous and well-sectioned, and its items themselves supply the validation/transaction/secret checks that feedback-loop caps require, so the simple-skill exception yields a 5 rather than a validation-capped 3. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is under 50 lines with no need for external references, and content is organized into clearly headed sections with no bundle files, matching the 'simple skill, progressive disclosure can score 5 with just well-organized sections' guideline. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |