Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, concise, and actionable skill body with a clear sequenced workflow and explicit verification steps. Main improvement opportunity is adding an explicit error-recovery loop in the VERIFY step.
Suggestions
Add an explicit feedback loop in VERIFY: e.g. 'If tests fail or ClassNotFound appears, re-check imports/package declarations, fix, and re-run testDebugUnitTest before proceeding.'
Trim the aphoristic Philosophy bullets or fold them into a single line to tighten token efficiency.
Make the MOVE step slightly more executable by noting how to update package declarations and run an import-wide find-replace (e.g. via the project's tooling).
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient with concrete commands throughout and little over-explanation of concepts Claude knows; only minor padding remains in the aphoristic Philosophy bullets and the somewhat elaborate journaling rules. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete executable commands (ktfmtFormat, testDebugUnitTest, assembleDebug) and a concrete PR title example with minor gaps such as no exact file-move command (inherently project-specific). | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear 5-step SCAN→SELECT→MOVE→VERIFY→PRESENT sequence with an explicit VERIFY checkpoint (format, compile, tests, circular-dependency check); falls short of 5 only because it lacks an explicit error-recovery feedback loop. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Under 50 lines, single-purpose, with well-organized sections (Goal, Constraints, Instructions, Examples) and no need for external references; per the simple-skill guidance this warrants a 5. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |