Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, lean instruction-only skill with a clear sequenced workflow, explicit approval checkpoint, and verification commands. Main gaps are the absence of concrete detection guidance in the SCAN step and no error-recovery loop after verification.
Suggestions
Add concrete detection aids to the SCAN step, such as specific grep/find patterns or directory heuristics for spotting Utils dumping grounds, layer violations, and feature code leaking into the app module.
Add an error-recovery loop after VERIFY: what to do when testDebugUnitTest reports broken imports or circular dependency warnings appear (e.g., fix imports, re-run ktfmtFormat, re-run tests).
Trim the Philosophy bullets to one line or remove them — aphorisms like 'A place for everything, and everything in its place' add tokens without actionable guidance.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is compact (~45 lines) with no explanations of known concepts and concrete commands throughout, but the 'Philosophy' bullets ('A place for everything, and everything in its place', 'File structure reflects system architecture') are motivational padding that could be trimmed, fitting 'efficient; minor instances of over-explanation'. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides copy-paste-ready Gradle commands ('./gradlew ktfmtFormat', './gradlew testDebugUnitTest', './gradlew assembleDebug') and a concrete PR title example ('ref: move UserDto from presentation to data.network.models'), but the SCAN step offers no concrete detection aids (e.g., grep patterns for Utils packages or layer violations), leaving minor gaps. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear five-step sequence (SCAN, SELECT & PROPOSE, MOVE, VERIFY, PRESENT) with an explicit user-approval gate before moving files and verification commands (format, compile, unit tests, circular dependency check). It falls short of a 5 because there is no error-recovery feedback loop for when tests or circular-dependency checks fail. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is under 50 lines with no bundle files needed and is cleanly organized into Goal, Constraints, Instructions, and Examples sections, matching the guideline that a short skill with well-organized sections and no need for external references scores 5. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |