Content
76%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The SKILL.md body is a concise, well-disclosed pointer to a real reference guide, scoring well on token efficiency and progressive disclosure. It is weakest on workflow clarity, since the multi-step authoring process and its validation gates live entirely in the external file.
Suggestions
Inline a short numbered summary of the mandatory gates (narrative arc, source every claim, over-claim audit, ≥2 cross-family reviews, portal registration) so the body has its own sequenced workflow with checkpoints.
Reconcile the body's 'three over-claim flavors' with the guide's five to avoid contradicting the referenced material.
Add an explicit validation checkpoint reference (e.g. 'confirm blog.json parses before PR') in the body to surface a feedback loop without bloating the file.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is a lean ~three-sentence overview that assumes Claude's competence and points to the detailed guide rather than re-explaining concepts; every token earns its place. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | It gives a concrete, executable directive — call `view_file` on the exact path `.agents/skills/blog-post/references/blog-authoring-guide.md` — but defers the actual drafting steps to the referenced guide rather than stating them inline. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Only a rough 'read the guide, then draft or edit' sequence is present; there are no numbered steps, validation checkpoints, or feedback loops in the body itself, and the publish/register workflow lives entirely in the external guide. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A single one-level-deep reference is clearly signaled and the target file (`references/blog-authoring-guide.md`) actually exists, but the body provides only a thin summary of what that guide contains. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |