CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

goal-scoping

Scope a GOAL (release / initiative / major objective) into a few coherent owned LANES — the planning front-end of the epic lifecycle. Convert goals into lanes (not scrap tickets); peers self-select lanes; the planner defines goal+lanes but never assigns a peer. Triggers: before decomposing a release/initiative/major-goal into work; when a goal needs scoping into owned streams; when work is being chased as scattered micro-tickets with no owned lanes; when tempted to skip planning OR to assign peers to lanes.

75

Quality

92%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

100%Weight 40%Scale 1-3

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

An exemplar minimal skill body: concise, actionable, and well-structured as a clear overview that defers detail to a single one-level-deep reference. No meaningful weaknesses in the body itself.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is a single lean gating paragraph with no padding of concepts Claude already knows; every token serves the trigger detection or the read-reference instruction.

3 / 3

Actionability

Gives concrete executable guidance — 'use the `view_file` tool to read and strictly adhere to `.agents/skills/goal-scoping/references/goal-scoping-workflow.md`' — naming a specific tool and file path.

3 / 3

Workflow Clarity

As a simple single-action skill, the body gives one unambiguous gating action ('MUST immediately... read and strictly adhere to... before scoping or assigning anything') with an explicit precondition, which the rubric's simple-skill note rewards with a 3.

3 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

The body is a concise overview pointing one level deep to a clearly signaled, verified reference file (references/goal-scoping-workflow.md) via a named tool — textbook clean progressive disclosure.

3 / 3

Total

12

/

12

Passed

Description

85%Weight 40%Scale 1-3

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A strong, specific description that answers both what and when with an explicit trigger clause and a distinct niche. Its main weakness is trigger phrasing dense with internal domain jargon rather than natural user language.

Suggestions

Reword triggers using plain user-facing phrasing (e.g., 'breaking down a release into work streams', 'deciding who owns what') instead of internal terms like 'owned LANES' and 'epic lifecycle'.

Add a few natural keyword triggers alongside the scenario-based ones so they read as things a user would actually say.

Consider softening the capitalized domain terms (GOAL/LANES) in the description to reduce jargon density while keeping the trigger scenarios.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists multiple concrete actions — 'Scope a GOAL... into a few coherent owned LANES', 'Convert goals into lanes (not scrap tickets); peers self-select lanes; the planner defines goal+lanes but never assigns a peer' — matching the multiple-specific-actions anchor.

3 / 3

Completeness

Clearly states what the skill does (scope a goal into owned lanes, the planning front-end) and provides an explicit 'Triggers:' clause answering when to use it, satisfying both what and when.

3 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

An explicit 'Triggers:' clause covers several natural scenarios, but the terms lean heavily on internal jargon ('owned LANES', 'epic lifecycle', 'scrap tickets', 'micro-tickets') rather than plain language a user would naturally say, so it stops short of the full-coverage anchor.

2 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Occupies a clear niche as the planning front-end (goal → owned lanes) distinct from per-lane/per-epic skills, with triggers unlikely to fire for the wrong skill.

3 / 3

Total

11

/

12

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
neomjs/neo
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.