Content
26%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is too sparse to be useful: it restates the description and points to an audit file that is absent from the bundle. There are no executable instructions or workflow steps a reader can follow.
Suggestions
Either add the missing audits/channel-separation.md file with the detailed guidance, or inline the essential content directly.
Provide concrete, executable steps (e.g., specific checks or commands) for applying the firewall rather than only a description.
Add a validation or verification step so Claude can confirm the firewall is correctly applied.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is extremely lean with no over-explanation, mostly respecting token budget, though it is so thin it re-states the description with little added value; this sits above the midpoint of efficient-but-could-be-tightened. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | The only guidance is a pointer to 'audits/channel-separation.md', which does not exist in the bundle; there is no concrete code, command, or specific instruction, matching the entirely-vague anchor. | 1 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | There is no multi-step sequence and no validation checkpoints, and the single referenced file is missing, so steps are effectively absent. | 1 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A single one-level reference is signaled, but the referenced file (audits/channel-separation.md) does not exist and no other bundle files are present, leaving navigation broken and structure minimal. | 2 / 5 |
Total | 8 / 20 Passed |