Content
90%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is an extremely concise, well-disclosed pointer to a single verified reference file, providing executable guidance for a simple delegating skill. Its only gap is the absence of explicit validation feedback loops, which matters less for a read-and-adhere workflow.
Suggestions
Add a brief one-line note on how to confirm the guide was followed (e.g., a checkpoint that the reference's checklist was completed) to strengthen workflow clarity.
Consider a short section header so the delegation stands out structurally rather than as a single unstructured sentence.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | A single lean sentence delegates to the reference guide with no over-explanation of concepts Claude already knows; every token earns its place. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Gives a concrete, executable instruction — invoke the `view_file` tool on a specific path — covering the common case directly. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The single action ('read the guide before proceeding') is unambiguous and sequenced, but as a delegating skill it lacks explicit validation checkpoints; this sits just below a 5. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Points to one real one-level-deep reference (tech-debt-radar-guide.md, verified present in ./references/) with a clear signal, though the body itself has no section structure. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |