Content
77%Weight 40%Scale 1-3Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A deliberately terse overview that excels at conciseness and progressive disclosure, correctly offloading detail to real reference files. Actionability and workflow clarity are capped at 2 because the body delegates nearly all executable/sequential detail to the referenced workflow rather than carrying a minimal inline skeleton.
Suggestions
Add a one-line inline summary of the gate's first concrete step (e.g. the validation-sweep order) so the body is actionable without opening the reference.
Surface a minimal validation checkpoint inline ('do not branch until the sweep, ROI, and duplicate checks pass') so the workflow's gating intent is visible in SKILL.md itself.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is extremely lean — five short lines that assume Claude's competence, delegate detail to references, and add no concept explanations; every token earns its place. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | It names a concrete tool (`view_file`) and a concrete path, but the core instruction ('read and strictly adhere to ... before proceeding') points to a reference rather than giving executable steps inline; the concrete action is delegated. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The sequence is present and unambiguous (do not begin; read the workflow; or use payload; self-authored carve first), but validation checkpoints and the multi-step ordering live entirely in the referenced 31KB workflow rather than in the body itself. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Clear overview with well-signaled, one-level-deep references (ticket-intake-workflow.md, self-authored-carve.md) that are real files in ./references/, and content is appropriately split rather than inlined. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |