Name: nax-settings-development
Rating: 60 (1 reviews)
Author: netalertx

nax-settings-development

Best practices for creating and maintaining NetAlertX settings (config.json), including UI, validation, localization, runtime behavior, and implementation consistency.

Quality

68%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

Securityby

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./.gemini/skills/settings/SKILL.md

Quality

Content

80%Weight 40%Scale 1-3

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The content is concise, concrete, and highly actionable with ready-to-use code and a thorough checklist, but it is organized as a flat list of 22 topics rather than a sequenced workflow and lacks any bundle-file separation, so progressive disclosure and workflow sequencing are less clear.

Suggestions

Reframe the guidelines as a sequenced workflow (decide type → name → validate → localize → defaults → backwards-compat → PR checklist) so the reader follows an ordered path with checkpoints.

Add an explicit validate/retry loop for risky changes in section 20 (rename/type-change/migration): 'after migration, run the settings validation and re-test rendering before submitting'.

Move the detailed reference material (e.g., full type list, localization JSON schemas) into a separate reference file and link to it from a concise overview to improve progressive disclosure.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Conciseness	The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence: every section is a terse imperative guideline with concrete code/table snippets, and no token is wasted explaining what config.json or localization is.	3 / 3
Actionability	It provides copy-paste-ready snippets (get_setting_value(), getSetting(), ccd()), concrete good/bad naming examples, exact JSON localization keys, and a fully specified PR checklist — executable and specific throughout.	3 / 3
Workflow Clarity	The 22 sections are a topic catalogue rather than a sequenced workflow, and the PR checklist (section 22) is a verification step but there is no validate→fix→retry feedback loop for the destructive/batch operations (renaming settings, migration) described in section 20.	2 / 3
Progressive Disclosure	Content is well-organized into numbered sections with a Quick Reference and external doc links, but the ~400-line body is a single monolithic file with no bundle files splitting out detailed reference material, so it is not a clear overview pointing one level deep.	2 / 3
	Total	10 / 12 Passed

Description

57%Weight 40%Scale 1-3

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is accurate and narrowly scoped to a clear niche, but it lists categories rather than concrete actions and omits an explicit 'Use when' trigger, leaving the what/when pair incomplete.

Suggestions

Add an explicit trigger clause such as 'Use when adding, modifying, or reviewing NetAlertX settings in config.json.'

Replace the abstract area list ('UI, validation, localization, runtime behavior') with concrete actions such as 'add settings, define validation, add localized strings, and maintain backwards compatibility'.

Include natural invocation terms like 'NetAlertX configuration' and 'add a setting' to improve trigger-term coverage.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Specificity	Names the domain ('NetAlertX settings (config.json)') and lists several areas ('UI, validation, localization, runtime behavior, and implementation consistency'), but these are categories rather than concrete actions, so it is not a comprehensive list of specific actions.	2 / 3
Completeness	It clearly answers 'what does this do' but the 'when' is only implied (a developer working on NetAlertX settings); there is no explicit 'Use when...' clause, which caps completeness at 2 per the guidelines.	2 / 3
Trigger Term Quality	'settings', 'config.json', 'UI', 'validation', and 'localization' are relevant keywords a developer might say, but it lacks common natural variations users would actually invoke like 'add a setting', 'change configuration', or 'NetAlertX configuration'.	2 / 3
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk	The scope is narrowly scoped to NetAlertX settings/config.json development, a distinct niche with triggers unlikely to overlap with other skills.	3 / 3
	Total	9 / 12 Passed

Validation

100%

Warnings & errors only

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository: netalertx/NetAlertX
Path: .gemini/skills/settings/SKILL.md
Commit: 20ddf48

Reviewed: 7 days ago

Table of Contents

Discovery Implementation Validation

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.