Name: nax-settings-development
Rating: 62.4 (1 reviews)
Author: netalertx

nax-settings-development

Best practices for creating and maintaining NetAlertX settings (config.json), including UI, validation, localization, runtime behavior, and implementation consistency.

Quality

72%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

Securityby

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./.gemini/skills/settings/SKILL.md

Quality

Content

75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is a well-structured, actionable conventions guide with concrete code, a lifecycle diagram, and a PR checklist that doubles as validation. It is efficient and clearly navigable, with only minor gaps in embedded feedback loops and offloaded detail.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Conciseness	The body is lean: short directive bullets, minimal code, and no padding explaining what config.json or settings are, matching 'efficient; minor instances of over-explanation'; not a 5 because some Good/Bad example pairs and short prose could be trimmed further.	4 / 5
Actionability	It provides executable snippets (get_setting_value, ccd(), getSetting), concrete file paths, and JSON examples; not a 5 because several sections give only abstract directives like 'Search for similar settings' without a concrete command.	4 / 5
Workflow Clarity	A runtime lifecycle diagram and a PR checklist provide a clear sequence with verification checkpoints; not a 5 because the checklist is a final gate rather than an embedded validate-fix-retry feedback loop within the workflow.	4 / 5
Progressive Disclosure	Content is well-organized into numbered sections with clearly signaled one-level external doc references and no nested references; not a 5 because all detail is inlined (no bundle files to split into) and the doc is long enough that some sections could offload detail.	4 / 5
	Total	16 / 20 Passed

Description

70%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is specific and well-scoped to NetAlertX settings with strong distinctiveness, but it lacks any explicit 'when to use' trigger guidance, which caps completeness. Adding a 'Use when...' clause would lift the weakest dimension.

Suggestions

Append a 'Use when...' clause, e.g. 'Use when adding or modifying NetAlertX settings, updating config.json, or localizing setting strings.'

Include natural synonyms users might say, such as 'preferences', 'options', or 'app configuration', to broaden trigger coverage.

Tighten the area list into concrete verbs (e.g. 'define, validate, localize, and render settings') for fuller action coverage.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Specificity	"creating and maintaining NetAlertX settings" names two concrete actions and enumerates covered areas (UI, validation, localization, runtime behavior, implementation consistency), matching the 'lists several specific actions; minor gaps' anchor; not a 5 because coverage is framed as areas rather than fully comprehensive concrete actions.	4 / 5
Completeness	It clearly states what the skill covers but provides no "Use when..." trigger clause, so per the judging guidelines completeness is capped at 3; not a 4 because 'when' is entirely absent rather than merely weak.	3 / 5
Trigger Term Quality	Natural terms a user would say are present ("NetAlertX settings", "config.json", "validation", "localization", "UI"), giving good keyword coverage; not a 5 because common synonyms/variants and an explicit trigger phrase are missing.	4 / 5
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk	The tie to "NetAlertX settings (config.json)" carves out a clear niche with distinct triggers and minimal overlap with other skills; not lower because it is unmistakably scoped to a single project's settings system.	5 / 5
	Total	16 / 20 Passed

Validation

100%

Warnings & errors only

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository: netalertx/NetAlertX
Path: .gemini/skills/settings/SKILL.md
Commit: 014b960

Reviewed: 5 days ago

Table of Contents

Discovery Implementation Validation

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.