Conciseness

Nearly all content is skill-specific operational detail Claude could not infer (CLI options table, engine behavior, output JSON schema, .env knobs) with no padding or explanations of known concepts. Minor trimming is possible — the "示例对话" example dialog largely repeats the earlier search command examples — placing it at anchor 4 rather than the fully lean anchor 5.

Actionability

Commands are fully executable and copy-paste ready (bash and PowerShell invocations, options with defaults, worked examples for pan/quality/limit/engine variations), the output JSON structure is documented field-by-field, and the referenced scripts (film-search.sh/.ps1/.js, shared/deep-extract.js) actually exist and implement the documented search/hot/resolve subcommands. This matches anchor 5 ('specific examples cover the common cases').

Workflow Clarity

The "Agent 使用流程" section gives a clear 5-step sequence with a conditional checkpoint (use resolve when a result has pageUrl but no url; surface extractCode). However, there is no guidance for failure or empty results (e.g., retry with different keywords or fall back to --engine web), so it sits at anchor 4 ('most checkpoints present; minor validation gaps') rather than anchor 5's explicit feedback loops.

Progressive Disclosure

Sections are well organized and the bundle is appropriately structured (scripts stay as executables invoked by path, verified to exist, rather than being inlined). But the ~145-line body keeps everything inline — the output-field reference and .env configuration could live in a references/ file — so it matches anchor 4 ('good structure; most content appropriately placed; minor organization gaps') rather than anchor 5's well-signaled separate references.

Specificity

The description names the domain and one concrete action ("Search cloud drives for downloadable film and TV resources") but does not enumerate the skill's other capabilities such as filtering by drive type or quality, or resolving redirect links. It clearly matches anchor 3 ('1-2 concrete actions, not comprehensive') rather than anchor 4, which expects several specific actions listed.

Completeness

It explicitly answers both what ("Search cloud drives for downloadable film and TV resources") and when ("Use this skill when the user wants to download a specific movie or TV show"), with concrete trigger phrases plus an explicit negative boundary ("Do NOT use for general movie information, schedules, reviews, or recommendations"). This matches anchor 5; anchor 4 would require a weaker or less explicit 'when' clause.

Trigger Term Quality

Natural user-facing terms are present ("movie", "TV show", "film", "TV series", "anime", "download a specific movie"), giving good keyword coverage. A few natural terms users might say are missing (e.g., "find", "watch", or specific cloud-drive names like quark), so it falls just below the comprehensive-synonym coverage of anchor 5.

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The downloading-resources niche is clearly distinct and the explicit "Do NOT use for general movie information, schedules, reviews, or recommendations" boundary minimizes conflict with information-retrieval skills. This is a clear anchor-5 fit ('clear niche with distinct triggers; minimal conflict risk').