Content
85%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is actionable, well-structured, and appropriately scoped with a clear workflow and verified bundle reference; the main weakness is mild redundancy where commands and ticker formats are repeated across sections.
Suggestions
Consolidate the analyze.py invocation so it appears once (e.g., in Usage) and have the Workflow reference it rather than re-printing the full command.
Remove the duplicate ticker-format listing by keeping the dedicated 'Stock Ticker Formats' section and trimming the inline repeats in the Usage examples.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly efficient with no concept-explanation fluff, but the analyze.py command is repeated in both Usage and Workflow, and ticker formats appear both inline in examples and in a dedicated section, so it could be tightened. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides fully executable commands (e.g., `python "$SKILLS_ROOT/stock-analyzer/scripts/analyze.py" 601288.SS`), a parameters table, concrete ticker-format examples, and the referenced script exists, making it copy-paste ready. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The Workflow gives a clear 3-step sequence (identify ticker with a web-search fallback, execute, interpret results); as a simple read-only analysis with an unambiguous action, it qualifies for the top anchor per the simple-skills scoring note. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is a well-organized overview that points to a single real, one-level-deep bundle file (scripts/analyze.py, verified to exist), with output detail deferred to the script and no nested references. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |