Content
100%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A lean, highly actionable, well-sequenced workflow with executable commands, explicit validation/stop checkpoints, and a clean single-file structure. It defers writing standards to an external file rather than restating them and provides an exact output contract.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence — 'Read `docs/CLAUDE.md` before starting — it has the writing standards' defers rather than restates standards, and there is no padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows. Not below 3 because every section earns its place. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | It provides fully executable commands (gh issue view, gh api, git checkout -b, git commit, git push -u), a concrete file-path mapping rule ('10_8 → 10.8'), and an exact copy-paste-ready output format (BRANCH_NAME=...). The only placeholders are justified slugs. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear numbered sequence (1–6) with explicit validation checkpoints and stop conditions — step 2C (can't find → STOP), step 3 (too vague → STOP, needs images → STOP), the 'Do NOT stop until...' guard, and the meaning-change skip rule — providing feedback loops for the fragile edit/push operation. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is a single self-contained SKILL.md with well-organized sections (Input, Workflow, Rules) and no nested multi-level references — the only external pointer is docs/CLAUDE.md, an out-of-skill repo file. Per the rubric's simple-skills note, well-organized single-file content with no bundle references scores 3. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |