Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A tight, well-organized instruction skill that points to the right discovery and validation commands without padding. Its main gap is the absence of a concrete Neva code-editing example to ground the core task.
Suggestions
Add one short, copy-paste-ready example of a minimal Neva snippet edit (or a 'before/after' refactor) to make the core task fully executable.
Tighten the validation checkpoint from 'when feasible' to an explicit step, e.g. 'After editing, compile or run the changed .neva program to confirm it is still valid.'
Optionally show the expected output of 'neva --help' or 'neva doc' so Claude can recognize correct behavior without running them.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and bullet-driven with no padding: it never explains what Neva is or how compilers work, and every line is actionable, assuming Claude's competence. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | It provides copy-paste-ready commands ('neva --help', 'go run ./cmd/neva --help', 'neva doc [package/path] [.] <pattern>') and concrete file paths, but lacks an actual Neva code-editing example, leaving a minor gap for the core task. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear editing sequence is present (discover CLI -> read style guide -> keep valid -> consult grammar if uncertain -> validate by compiling/running) with an explicit validation checkpoint, though validation is conditional ('when feasible') rather than a hard gate. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Under 50 lines with well-organized sections (CLI Discovery, Rules) and one-level-deep pointers to detailed repo materials (style_guide.md, neva.g4) rather than inlining them; no bundle files are needed for this simple skill. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |