Content
92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A lean, highly actionable release-prep skill body with concrete commands, a well-sequenced workflow, and explicit verification steps. The only weakness is light redundancy between the Guardrails and Example Quality Check sections.
Suggestions
Consolidate the 'keep examples minimal / do not pad' guidance so it lives in one place rather than being restated across Guardrails and Example Quality Check.
Add one explicit error-recovery loop for the build step (e.g., 'if make build fails, stop and report rather than proceeding to checksums') to strengthen the existing validation checkpoints.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense and actionable with concrete commands and no over-explanation of git/gh concepts, but there is minor redundancy between the Guardrails section ('Do not pad examples...') and the Example Quality Check section ('Keep snippets minimal'). | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides copy-paste-ready commands throughout ('git fetch origin --tags --prune', 'make build', 'shasum -a 256', 'gh release create <tag> <assets...> --target main --title <tag> --notes-file <file> --draft', 'rg "v?X\\.Y\\.Z"') covering the common release cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A 9-step checklist-style workflow with explicit validation checkpoints (ensure clean working tree, verify expected platform binaries, verify metadata/uploaded assets via gh release view) and an ask-if-ambiguous bump-policy gate before tagging. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist and none are needed; the body is self-contained and well-organized into Overview, Core Tools, Workflow, Guardrails, and Example Quality Check sections, which satisfies the simple/well-organized exception. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |