Content
100%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A tightly written, highly actionable release-preparation workflow with concrete commands, specific repo paths, and embedded verification checkpoints. It assumes Claude's competence and avoids padding, though a couple of guardrail bullets slightly restate workflow guidance.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and project-specific; assumes competence (no explanation of gh/git/make), with every step earning its place. It avoids the verbose concept-explanation pattern of the score-1 anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides concrete, copy-paste-ready commands ('git fetch origin --tags --prune', 'gh release create <tag> ... --draft', 'make build', 'shasum -a 256', 'rg "v?X\.Y\.Z"') plus exact file paths (pkg/version.go, std/neva.yml), matching the fully-executable anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear 9-step sequence with explicit validation checkpoints (clean working tree, verify expected binaries, verify uploaded assets via 'gh release view', and an 'rg' audit of remaining version hits) rather than the validation-gap score-2 anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | A single self-contained file with well-organized sections (Overview, Core Tools, Workflow, Guardrails, Example Quality Check) and no nested references; with no bundle files present, this matches the well-organized-sections anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |