Content
72%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is concise and well-structured with clean progressive disclosure to real reference files. Its weaknesses are vague, non-executable routing steps and the absence of validation checkpoints in the workflow.
Suggestions
Replace the abstract routing step with a concrete subcommand-dispatch example showing how $ARGUMENTS maps to a reference file.
Add an explicit validation or preview step for the create operation (e.g. open the generated HTML to confirm it renders before returning).
Flesh out references/create.md with executable guidance so the subcommand path is actionable rather than a stub.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence — no padding, no explanations of basic concepts — and every section earns its place. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Routing guidance ('Load corresponding references/{subcommand}.md', 'Execute with remaining arguments') is high-level rather than executable, and the create.md reference is too thin to be concrete. | 3 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The three-step routing sequence is listed but lacks validation checkpoints or feedback loops for the create operation, leaving checkpoints implicit. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is a clear overview with well-signaled, one-level-deep references organized in tables, and all referenced files (create.md, layout-patterns.md, html-template.md, copywriting-formulas.md, slide-strategies.md) are real bundle files. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |