Content
82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
An exemplary lean template-skill body: concrete copy-and-validate workflow, tight constraints, and a well-signaled bundle structure. The residual weaknesses are a phantom `example.html` in the resource map, no error-recovery loop after the checklist validation, and motion-design steps that reference template internals by outcome rather than by named hooks.
Suggestions
Fix the resource map (and checklist P0) to match the actual bundle: either add `example.html` or remove it, since it is currently advertised but missing.
Add a feedback loop after step 7: 'If any P0 checklist item fails, fix the template output and re-validate before emitting.'
Name the concrete CSS variables or template hooks to edit in steps 1 and 4 (e.g. the accent/serif variable names in template.html) so the mapping and motion-preservation steps are fully executable.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is ~44 lean lines with zero padding: no explanation of what HTML/CSS/JS is, no design-theory lecturing, and directives like 'Avoid sandbox-hostile browser APIs (e.g. localStorage and confirm)' and 'Keep output single-file HTML with inline CSS and JS' assume Claude's competence. Every token earns its place, matching anchor 5. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Steps are executable and specific — 'Copy `assets/template.html` to `index.html`', 'do not increase default page dwell above 3 seconds', 'Validate with `references/checklist.md`' — and the Output contract gives a copy-paste artifact XML wrapper. It stops short of anchor 5 because steps 1 and 4 ('map colors, typography tone, and layout rhythm into CSS variables', 'Preserve premium motion behavior') reference behavior that lives only in the template file without naming the concrete variables/hooks to edit. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear seven-step sequence from reading DESIGN.md through copying the template, preserving constraints, to an explicit final validation step ('Validate with `references/checklist.md` before emitting') — matching anchor 4's clear sequence with a checkpoint. It misses anchor 5 because there is no feedback loop (e.g. 'if checklist P0 items fail, fix and re-validate') and the validation step does not state what to do on failure. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A resource map lists the bundle, both referenced paths (assets/template.html, references/checklist.md) exist and are one level deep, and the body stays a concise overview pointing to them — mostly anchor 5. The gap keeping it at anchor 4 is that the resource map and checklist P0 both list `example.html`, which is absent from the actual bundle, so one advertised reference is a dead path. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |