CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

brandkit

Premium brand-kit image generation skill for creating high-end brand-guidelines boards, logo systems, identity decks, and visual-world presentations. Trained for minimalist, cinematic, editorial, dark-tech, luxury, cultural, security, gaming, developer-tool, and consumer-app brand systems. Optimized for intentional logo concepting, refined composition, sparse typography, strong symbolic meaning, premium mockups, art-directed imagery, and flexible grid layouts.

56

Quality

64%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./skills/brandkit/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

63%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is a rich, well-organized art-direction reference with a concrete prompt template and clear panel/mode system, making it highly actionable for image generation. Its main weaknesses are verbosity from repeated adjective and cue lists, and a monolithic structure with no progressive disclosure to separate reference files despite its length.

Suggestions

Move the visual-modes catalog and the alternate layout systems (2×3, 4×2, etc.) into one-level-deep reference files (e.g. VISUAL_MODES.md, LAYOUTS.md) and link them from SKILL.md.

Collapse the recurring 'Use for / Visual cues / Logo logic / Mood' blocks into a tighter shared format to cut repeated adjective lists.

Add an explicit numbered generation sequence at the top (strategy → mode → layout → panels → prompt → output) so the workflow reads as a checklist rather than a catalog.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The ~800-line body is mostly purposeful art-direction payload rather than explanation of known concepts, but it is padded with repeated adjective lists ('precise, sharp, confident, builder-native') and recurring 'Use for / Visual cues / Logo logic / Mood' blocks that could be tightened.

3 / 5

Actionability

Provides concrete, specific guidance for an instruction-only image-gen skill: a fill-in prompt template ('Create a premium brand-kit overview image for [BRAND NAME]...'), explicit default layouts, a 9-panel system, named visual modes, and palette examples — directly actionable with only minor gaps.

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

A clear implied sequence runs through the sections (infer strategy → choose visual mode → pick layout → compose panels → fill prompt template → final output), and the operation is non-destructive single-output so validation checkpoints are not critical, though no explicit numbered sequence ties them together.

4 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

Headers and sectioning are clean and navigable, but at ~800 lines it is a monolithic single file with no bundle/reference files, and the visual-modes catalog and multiple layout systems are inlined content that could live in one-level-deep reference files.

3 / 5

Total

14

/

20

Passed

Description

66%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description clearly conveys what the skill produces and covers a strong range of concrete brand-kit deliverables with natural trigger terms, but it omits any explicit 'when to use' guidance and leans on quality adjectives in its latter sentences. Adding a 'Use when...' clause would raise completeness and overall score.

Suggestions

Append an explicit trigger clause, e.g. 'Use when the user asks for a brand kit, brand-guidelines board, logo system, or identity deck image.'

Trim aspirational adjectives ('intentional', 'refined', 'art-directed') in favor of one or two additional concrete output types.

Add common synonyms/extensions users might say (e.g. 'brand identity', 'style guide', 'visual identity') to broaden trigger coverage.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Names several concrete deliverables ('brand-guidelines boards, logo systems, identity decks, and visual-world presentations') plus specific outputs like 'premium mockups' and 'art-directed imagery', but the second and third sentences are largely quality adjectives rather than additional actions, leaving minor coverage gaps.

4 / 5

Completeness

The 'what' is clearly stated (premium brand-kit image generation), but there is no 'Use when...' clause or equivalent explicit trigger guidance in the description, which caps completeness at 3 per the rubric guideline.

3 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Includes natural phrases a user would actually say ('brand kit', 'brand-guidelines boards', 'logo systems', 'identity decks') with good keyword coverage, though common synonyms and file-format-style variations are not exhaustively listed.

4 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Occupies a clear niche (premium brand-kit / identity image generation) with distinct triggers, with only minor overlap risk against more general image-generation skills.

4 / 5

Total

15

/

20

Passed

Validation

87%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation14 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

skill_md_line_count

SKILL.md is long (823 lines); consider splitting into references/ and linking

Warning

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

14

/

16

Passed

Repository
nexu-io/open-design
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.