Content
82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, highly actionable instruction skill: concrete rubrics with band anchors, a worked example, explicit output contract, and a clear 5-step workflow. The main gaps are a slightly long single-file body (dimension rubric detail is reference material), no final self-validation pass in the workflow, and a few trimmable rhetorical flourishes.
Suggestions
Trim rhetorical flourish in the dimension anchors (e.g. 'the kind of detail that makes printed-by-hand typographers nod', 'Magazine-grade') to sharpen conciseness — the band definitions are already sufficient calibration.
Add an explicit final validation step to the workflow, e.g. 'Step 6 — before emitting, re-check the report against the Hard rules (5 scores, evidence per score, mean ≤ 8, single-file HTML)' to close the feedback loop.
Move the five per-dimension anchors and evidence checklists into a one-level-deep reference file (e.g. references/dimensions.md) and keep only the one-line question and band summary in SKILL.md, improving progressive disclosure and token efficiency.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Largely efficient — band anchors, evidence checklists, and a compact example evidence block all earn their tokens by calibrating judgment rather than teaching known concepts. Minor trimmable flourish remains (e.g. 'the kind of detail that makes printed-by-hand typographers nod', 'Magazine-grade', 'three styles in a trench coat'), matching the 4-anchor 'efficient; minor instances of over-explanation that could be trimmed'. Not a 3: there is no padded explanation of concepts Claude already knows; not a 5: the colorful asides and some bilingual labels cost tokens without adding instruction. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Fully actionable for an instruction-only skill: exact report structure (header, SVG radar, 5 dimension cards, combined action lists), per-dimension 0–10 band definitions, bullet-count constraints ('Keep (3–5 bullets)... each ≤ 1 sentence... 5–15 minutes each'), a worked evidence-paragraph example with class names and line-level specifics, and a copy-paste output contract with the artifact wrapper. Matches the 5-anchor 'specific examples cover the common cases'. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear 5-step sequence (acquire → read enough to score → score with evidence → build action lists → emit report) with useful checkpoints like 'If multiple HTML files exist, ask which one' and 'Do not score from frontmatter alone', plus a scoring-discipline self-check section. This matches the 4-anchor 'clear sequence with most checkpoints present; minor validation gaps'. Not a 5: there is no explicit validate-and-recover loop on the emitted report (e.g. re-checking the artifact against the hard rules before finishing); not a 3: the sequence is complete and checkpoints are explicit, and no destructive/batch validation cap applies. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist (no references/, scripts/, assets/), and the body has no dangling references to external files — it is a self-contained single-file skill with well-organized sections (When to use, What you produce, The 5 dimensions, Workflow, Output contract, Hard rules). Matches the 4-anchor 'good structure; most content is appropriately placed; minor organization gaps'. Not a 5: at ~220 lines, the five per-dimension rubrics (anchors + evidence lists) are reference-style material that could live in a one-level-deep reference file to slim SKILL.md; not a 3: nothing is buried or mis-signaled. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |