Content
82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A highly actionable, well-structured design skill with concrete specs and a crisp output contract. The main weakness is a subjective self-check that lacks a runnable fix-and-retry loop.
Suggestions
Make the self-check runnable where possible — e.g., assert the accent token appears in ≤4 places via a grep/count rather than a subjective 'restrained' judgment.
Add an explicit fix-and-retry loop after the self-check (if a check fails, revise the offending section and re-verify) to strengthen workflow_clarity.
Tighten the editorial prose in the intro paragraph to remove flavor text that does not change the output.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly lean and purposeful with specific copy examples and concrete layout specs; a little editorial flavor text ('feels like a Sunday-paper dating column rendered as software') could be trimmed but earns its place for a design skill. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Fully executable guidance: pixel widths (220–260px), font-feature-settings: 'tnum', data-od-id attributes, an SVG bar chart with ~30 bars, and a precise output contract with artifact tags — copy-paste ready. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear 5-step sequence ending in a self-check checkpoint, but the self-check is subjective ('reads as restrained, editorial, slightly funny') with no fix-and-retry feedback loop, leaving a minor validation gap. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Single well-organized SKILL.md with clear Workflow and Output contract sections and a one-level reference to an injected DESIGN.md; no bundle files to misplace, though it sits just over the 50-line simple-skill threshold. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |