Content
72%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a token-efficient, highly concrete design spec well-suited to a simple single-file skill. Its main gaps are the absence of a complete executable skeleton and an explicit post-build validation checkpoint for the hard no-overflow constraint.
Suggestions
Add a minimal complete single-file HTML skeleton (canvas wrapper with transform: scale, one <section class="slide">, Tailwind CDN, keyboard/hash nav, corner badges) so the spec is copy-paste ready rather than fragmentary.
Insert an explicit validation checkpoint in the build flow, e.g. 'After composing each slide, verify content fits 1920×1080 with no scrollbars; if it overflows, reduce type scale or padding tier before proceeding.'
Show one short worked example page (e.g., a cover or question layout) applying the type scale, one palette, and the single-visual-center rule so the layout-freedom guidance is concrete rather than abstract.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is a dense spec with exact values (type scale in px, padding tiers, palette hex codes, font names) and explains no concepts Claude already knows, so every token earns its place — matching 'Lean and efficient; assumes Claude's competence' rather than the padded score 2. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Guidance is highly concrete (exact CSS 'width: 1920px; height: 1080px; transform: scale(...)', exact section markup '<section class="slide" data-slide-id="<n>">', exact fonts and hex codes), but there is no complete executable HTML/React skeleton integrating these specs, so it is not fully copy-paste ready — matching 'Some concrete guidance but incomplete' rather than the score-3 complete-example anchor. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Sections are clearly organized (硬性技术规格, 调色板, 布局自由度, 字体, 设计细节) and the single task is largely unambiguous, but there is no explicit build sequence or validation checkpoint; the '绝对禁止 overflow' rule is a constraint rather than a verify step, matching 'Steps listed but validation gaps' / implicit checkpoints rather than the score-3 explicit-validation anchor. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | This is a single-file skill under 50 lines with no external references (no references/, scripts/, or assets/ bundle exists) and the body is organized into clearly labeled sections, so per the rubric's simple-skills note progressive disclosure scores 3 with just well-organized sections. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |