Content
85%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is concise, well-structured, and presents a clear workflow with a validation checkpoint and error-recovery loop. Its main weakness is actionability: it describes the form mechanism but never shows a concrete template the agent can copy.
Suggestions
Include a concrete `<question-form>` / `direction-cards` markup example so the guidance is copy-paste ready.
Show one sample direction card with an id, label, and short description to make the output format unambiguous.
Optionally add a one-line 'Completion' checklist restating the direction-id condition as an explicit verification step.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean (~25 lines), assumes Claude's competence, and avoids explaining known concepts; even the opening rationale is a single tight sentence, matching the anchor-3 "lean and efficient; every token earns its place." | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Guidance is specific (3-5 directions, visual/structural/tonal, an inline `<question-form>` with a `direction-cards` question) but no actual form template or markup example is shown, so it is not copy-paste ready per the anchor-2 "some concrete guidance but incomplete." | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The sequence (draft -> emit form -> user picks -> lock onto choice) is explicit, with a completion checkpoint (form answer contains a direction id) and a feedback loop (backtracking forces a fresh iteration), matching the anchor-3 "clear sequence with explicit validation steps; feedback loops for error recovery." | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | This is a short single-purpose skill under 50 lines with no external references, and it is organized into clear sections (Convergence, Anti-patterns), so per the rubric's simple-skills note it earns a 3 on well-organized sections alone. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |