Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is admirably lean and gives a concrete, sequenced workflow with an exact output contract, but the bundle wiring undercuts it: the validation checklist exists yet is never referenced from the workflow, and the resource map advertises an example.html that is missing. Wiring the checklist in as an explicit verification step would fix both weak spots at once.
Suggestions
Add a final workflow step such as 'Verify against `references/checklist.md` (P0 items: sandbox-safe APIs, working navigation, exactly three slides)' so the existing checklist is actually signaled and used.
Fix the bundle mismatch: either create `example.html` with realistic editorial copy as listed in the resource map and frontmatter `od.outputs.secondary`, or remove it from the resource map.
Add a one-line pointer to the palette/typography source of truth (e.g., 'Extract colors and type scale from `assets/template.html`') so the design tokens are discoverable without opening the file unprompted.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is ~40 lean lines: a one-line intro, a compact resource map, a 5-step workflow, and an output contract with a minimal artifact snippet. No concepts Claude already knows are explained, and every section earns its place — matching the 'lean and efficient' top anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Guidance is mostly executable: 'Start from `assets/template.html`', a named 3-slide sequence, specific interaction keys ('ArrowLeft / ArrowRight'), and an exact output contract snippet. It falls short of 5 because the design tokens/copy rules live only in the template file without summary, and no verification guidance is given. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The workflow is a clear, well-ordered 5-step sequence (template → preserve slide structure → replace copy → keep interactions → keep sandbox-safe), matching 'clear sequence with most checkpoints present'. It misses 5 because there is no validation step even though the bundle ships `references/checklist.md` that the workflow never invokes; the destructive/batch cap does not apply since this is a non-destructive template skill. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Structure is decent (resource map + workflow pointing to `assets/template.html`, which exists), but `references/checklist.md` is never signaled or linked in the body prose — only buried in the file tree — and the resource map lists `example.html` which does not exist in the bundle. This matches the 'references present but not clearly signaled' anchor rather than the clearly-navigable level 4. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |