CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

enhance-prompt

Improve prompts with design specs and UI/UX vocabulary. Useful for design-to-code workflows and clarifying requests for visual output.

62

Quality

73%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./skills/enhance-prompt/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

72%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The content is concise and well-organized with clean sectioning that defers heavy assets upstream. Its weakness is actionability and workflow clarity: the install path is underspecified, with the only command being a browser launch rather than a real executable install step.

Suggestions

Replace the `open https://...` line with a concrete install command (e.g., a `git clone` or `skills add` invocation) so Claude can act without inspecting a README.

Add a verification step after install (e.g., 'confirm the skill appears in `skills list` before invoking by name') to close the workflow gap.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is lean and avoids explaining concepts Claude already knows; sections are short and each token largely earns its place, with only minor redundancy from restating the description, matching anchor 3.

3 / 3

Actionability

The only command is `open https://...` (a browser launch), and the actual install step ("install the upstream bundle into your active agent's skills directory") is deferred to a README for "exact paths", so guidance is concrete but incomplete, matching anchor 2.

2 / 3

Workflow Clarity

Steps are sequenced (inspect README, install bundle, invoke by name/trigger), but the install step lacks a concrete command and there is no verification checkpoint, matching anchor 2 (sequence present, gaps in detail/checkpoints).

2 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

This is a short, well-organized skill under 50 lines with clear sections (What it does, Source, How to use) and no local bundle files, appropriately deferring detailed assets upstream; per the guideline such simple skills can score 3 on organization alone.

3 / 3

Total

10

/

12

Passed

Description

75%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description clearly answers both what the skill does and when to use it, with a distinct, low-conflict niche. Its main weakness is listing only a single core action and relying on a separate triggers field rather than embedding natural keywords in the description body.

Suggestions

Expand the description to list multiple concrete actions (e.g., 'add design specs, inject UI/UX vocabulary, restructure prompts for visual output') to lift specificity to anchor 3.

Embed natural trigger keywords directly in the description (e.g., 'Use when improving prompts for UI, design vocabulary, or visual output') instead of relying only on the separate triggers field.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

The description names the domain ("design specs and UI/UX vocabulary") and one core action ("Improve prompts"), but does not enumerate multiple distinct concrete actions, matching anchor 2 rather than the multi-action anchor 3.

2 / 3

Completeness

It states both what it does ("Improve prompts with design specs and UI/UX vocabulary") and when to use it ("Useful for design-to-code workflows and clarifying requests for visual output"), an explicit trigger clause matching anchor 3.

3 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

The `triggers` field provides natural phrases like "enhance prompt" and "design vocabulary", but coverage is thin and the description body itself omits the keywords users would naturally say, matching anchor 2 (some relevant keywords, missing common variations).

2 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The design-specs/UI-UX-vocabulary niche is clearly bounded with distinct triggers and is unlikely to overlap with general utility skills, matching anchor 3.

3 / 3

Total

10

/

12

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository
nexu-io/open-design
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.