Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a clear, actionable instruction set with good structure and no concept-teaching padding. Tightening the example block and adding a verify-and-fix checkpoint would push it toward top scores.
Suggestions
Condense the example-questions section to a representative 3-4 per category or move it to a reference file to improve token efficiency.
Add an explicit validation step after writing the HTML (e.g., open and confirm keyboard search/filter behavior) with a fix-and-retry loop before declaring the artifact done.
Remove filler phrasing like "optional, depends on UX preference" in favor of a single stated convention.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is efficient and assumes Claude's knowledge (no concept explanations), but the 16-item example-questions block and filler like "optional, depends on UX preference" could be trimmed, keeping it just below fully lean. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete, actionable guidance (semantic <details>/<summary>, ARIA, data-category/data-od-id attributes, transition techniques) with only the absence of literal copy-paste code as a minor gap for this instruction-only skill. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear numbered sequence with edge cases and a self-check section, but it lacks an explicit validate-then-fix feedback loop, keeping it below the top anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized sections (Workflow, Output contract, Example questions) with no unnecessary external references; at ~84 lines it sits just above the simple-skill 5-exception threshold, so the minor length keeps it at 4. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |