Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A lean, token-efficient design spec that gives Claude everything needed to produce an NYT-style chart frame: exact colors, typography, layout proportions, animation timings, and per-chart-type rules. Main gaps are the absence of a minimal executable HTML/SVG starter and any explicit output-file step (the frontmatter preview expects index.html, which the body never names).
Suggestions
Add a minimal executable HTML/SVG starter skeleton (matching the '≤80 lines inline SVG' rule) so the output is copy-paste ready.
State the font-loading mechanism (e.g., Google Fonts CDN link) since 'single-file HTML' with Source Serif Pro / IBM Plex requires it.
Name the output file explicitly (index.html, per the frontmatter preview entry) as a final step.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is pure design specification — exact hex colors ('#a91d1d', '#f7f5ee'), px sizes (11px, 2.5px), vw units, font stacks, and animation timings (200ms, 1.2s ease-out) with zero padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows. Every line carries a constraint. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete, executable guidance throughout: canvas dims '1920×1080', '单文件 HTML', '手写 SVG, 不超过 80 行 inline', an HTML snippet '<text class="annot">2024 · 412M</text>', and per-chart-type specs. Minor gaps: no complete starter HTML/SVG skeleton and no font-loading mechanism (CDN link) specified for the single-file output. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Sections follow the build order (kicker → title → chart → source → animation) and the input branch ('如果输入是文本结论, 自动估算合理坐标…如果是 CSV/JSON, 直接绘制') is explicit. Not 5: there are no validation checkpoints (e.g., verifying data sufficiency or output renders), though the task is non-destructive so the cap doesn't apply. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is ~23 lines, single-purpose, references no external files (and no references/ bundle exists), and is cleanly sectioned (模板/意图/画布/布局/设计细节). Per the under-50-lines guideline, well-organized sections with no need for external references score 5. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |