Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A lean, highly concrete design spec: every section delivers exact values (sizes, colors, fonts, stroke parameters) with no filler, and the deliverable is unambiguous. The only gaps are the literal 'linear-gradient(...)' placeholder for the tape, the absent SVG markup example, and the single-file-HTML requirement being buried in the constraints section.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Every line carries a design constant ("240×180px", "#fcd34d / #fca5a5 / #a7f3d0 / #a5b4fc", "stroke `#2a2a2a`, width 2.5", "transform: rotate(±2deg)") with zero padding and no explanation of concepts Claude already knows — every token earns its place. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | The spec is almost fully executable — exact dimensions, hex colors, shadow parameters, dash patterns, and named fonts ("Kalam / Caveat / Patrick Hand") — but the tape decoration is given as the literal placeholder "linear-gradient(...)" and no SVG path or marker snippet is provided, leaving minor gaps versus the copy-paste-ready anchor at 5. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The body follows a clear build order (canvas → nodes → connectors → optional interactions → constraints) and the single deliverable is unambiguous ("单文件 HTML", 5–12 nodes, explicit 严禁 list), but the 'what to produce' statement and the real-content requirement sit in the final 【设计细节】 section rather than up front, and no verification of the output (e.g. checking connectors don't cross) is specified. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is under 50 lines, needs no external references (none exist in the bundle), and is organized into clearly labeled sections (【画布】【节点】【连接线】【可选交互】【设计细节】) — the simple-skill case where well-organized sections alone merit a 5. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |