Conciseness

The body is a dense, spec-style list with concrete values and no padding explaining what glitch art is; only minor bits like 'Inspired by hyperframes glitch' could be trimmed, so it is efficient but not perfectly lean.

Actionability

Concrete guidance dominates — exact hex colors, px/vw sizes, font names, keyframe durations, and CSS filter references — making it mostly executable, though it stops short of complete copy-paste HTML.

Workflow Clarity

Sections are logically ordered (canvas, title, additional layers, filter, design details) and the single-frame task is unambiguous, but it is not a numbered sequence with explicit validation checkpoints, so it sits just below 5.

Progressive Disclosure

This is a simple under-50-line single-purpose skill with no external references and well-organized section headers, meeting the rubric's exception allowing a 5 on progressive disclosure for well-structured simple skills.

Specificity

The description names the domain with three concrete visual techniques ("Digital glitch, chromatic offset, and data-corruption") and the output type, but these are descriptive attributes rather than concrete verb-based actions, so it sits at the 'names domain and 1-2 concrete actions' level.

Completeness

The "what" is clear (a glitch title frame), but there is no explicit "Use when..." clause; the trailing "for video transitions or cyberpunk heroes" is only weak implicit trigger guidance, which caps completeness at 3 per the rubric guideline.

Trigger Term Quality

Natural terms users would say are present ("glitch", "cyberpunk", "title", "video transitions"), giving good keyword coverage, though "chromatic offset" and "data-corruption" lean technical and a few synonyms are missing.

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The niche (glitch/cyberpunk data-corruption title frames) is mostly distinct with minimal overlap risk, though it could overlap with other video title or VFX template skills.