CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo
SkillPublic

full-output-enforcement

Overrides default LLM truncation behavior. Enforces complete code generation, bans placeholder patterns, and handles token-limit splits cleanly. Apply to any task requiring exhaustive, unabridged output.

68

Quality

86%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide
SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A tight, highly actionable single-purpose skill: exact banned-pattern tokens, a concrete three-step execution process with a validation cross-check, and a well-specified pause/resume protocol. The only minor weakness is slight motivational padding in the Baseline section.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is directive and mostly lean, with only minor trimmable padding — the Baseline section's motivational framing ("Treat every task as production-critical", the parallel "If the user asks..." lines, "No exceptions") restates what Claude already knows. This fits anchor 4 rather than anchor 5, where every token earns its place.

4 / 5

Actionability

Guidance is fully executable for an instruction-only skill: an enumerated list of exact banned strings, a copy-paste pause message template ("[PAUSED — X of Y complete. Send 'continue' to resume...]") and a concrete scope-count-then-cross-check protocol. This matches anchor 5's copy-paste-ready, common-case-covering standard.

5 / 5

Workflow Clarity

The Execution Process is a clear sequence (Scope → Build → Cross-check) with an explicit validation step ("If anything is missing, add it before responding") and a Quick Check checklist, matching anchor 5's explicit-validation-plus-checklist profile. The skill is single-purpose and non-destructive, so no validation cap applies.

5 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

The skill is under 50 lines, self-contained with no external references needed, and organized into clear, well-ordered sections (Baseline, Banned Output Patterns, Execution Process, Handling Long Outputs, Quick Check). The simple-skill exception applies and the structure is easy to navigate.

5 / 5

Total

19

/

20

Passed

Description

75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A solid description that names concrete capabilities and includes an explicit applicability clause. Its main weakness is that the "when" is broad and circular rather than tied to concrete trigger phrases, and it lacks common user phrasings like "no ellipses" or "don't cut off".

Suggestions

Make the "when" clause concrete with trigger phrases users would actually say, e.g. "Apply when the user says 'full output', 'no placeholders', 'complete code', 'don't truncate', or complains about ellipses (// ...) or omitted sections."

Add missing natural trigger synonyms such as "no ellipses", "write the entire file", and "don't cut off" to broaden keyword coverage to anchor-5 level.

Briefly mention the pause/resume protocol (e.g. "pauses at clean breakpoints with a '[PAUSED — X of Y complete]' marker on token-limit overflow") to close the specificity gap.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

"Enforces complete code generation, bans placeholder patterns, and handles token-limit splits cleanly" lists several concrete actions, matching anchor 4. It falls short of anchor 5 because coverage has gaps ("cleanly" is vague and the pause/resume protocol is not mentioned).

4 / 5

Completeness

Both a clear "what" and an explicit "Apply to any task requiring exhaustive, unabridged output" clause are present, matching anchor 4. The "when" is generic and circular rather than anchored to concrete trigger phrases, so it does not reach anchor 5.

4 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

The description includes natural terms users would say ("complete code", "placeholder", "truncation", "exhaustive, unabridged output"), giving good keyword coverage. A few common phrasings are missing ("don't cut off", "no ellipses", "write the full file"), keeping it below anchor 5.

4 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The niche (overriding truncation and placeholder behavior) is distinct with domain-specific vocabulary, fitting anchor 4. "Apply to any task requiring exhaustive, unabridged output" is broad enough to overlap with general code-writing skills, preventing anchor 5.

4 / 5

Total

16

/

20

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository

nexu-io/open-design

Path

skills/output-skill/SKILL.md

Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.