Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A tight, well-structured instruction-only skill that tells Claude exactly what to build. Adding a minimal HTML scaffold/example and a verification step would lift the two 4-scored dimensions.
Suggestions
Add a small inline HTML scaffold or a one-section example so the output contract shows the expected markup shape, not just the artifact wrapper.
Append a verification step (e.g., confirm all six layout sections and the five-item checklist are present before emitting) to add an explicit checkpoint to the workflow.
Specify one or two example activities/outcomes for the Day-1 panel and milestone cards to reduce ambiguity in the generative sections.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and efficient at ~25 lines — "Produce a single-screen onboarding plan in HTML" plus a tight layout spec; assumes Claude's competence and contains no padding or restated concepts. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete per-section guidance (cover banner fields, Day 1 schedule slots, Mon→Fri timeline, 30/60/90 milestone cards) plus an output contract, but no HTML example/scaffold and section contents like "three concrete outcomes each" are left for Claude to fill — minor gaps. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear four-step sequence (read DESIGN.md → identify role/tenure → layout → finalize style/HTML), but no explicit verification checkpoint confirming all sections are present before emitting the artifact — a minor validation gap. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Under 50 lines with well-organized Workflow and Output contract sections and no need for external bundle references; meets the simple-skill exception for a top score. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |