Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is an exemplary lean design spec: every token is a constraint, value, or archetype, and the pre-flight checklist doubles as validation. The only gaps are the absence of a starter scaffold and an implicit rather than explicit build sequence, neither of which materially hurts usability for a designer-model audience.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is a lean, dense spec — exact hex values ('#0A0A0A', '#E61919'), clamp() scales, and opacity caps — with zero padding and no explanation of concepts Claude already knows. The few flavor lines ('we are not selling, we are reporting') carry design intent and earn their place. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Guidance is highly concrete and executable: exact colors, 'display: grid; gap: 1px' hairline technique, 'repeating-linear-gradient(135deg, ...)' hazard stripes, opacity ceilings, eleven named slide archetypes, and a 10-item pre-flight checklist. It falls short of 5 only because no starter slide scaffold or worked example is provided. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Structure is clear and logical (hard rules → banned → required archetypes → motion → pre-flight validation), and the pre-flight checklist is an explicit validation checkpoint. Not a 5 because the build sequence itself is implicit — the sections define constraints rather than an ordered procedure with checkpoints. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist (references/, scripts/, assets/ are absent) and none are needed; the ~70-line body is well organized into clean sections with no content that belongs in a separate file. This fits the simple-skill exception: well-organized sections with no external references warrant a 5. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |