Content
85%Weight 40%Scale 1-3Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a lean, well-organized, self-contained style spec with exact values and a pre-flight validation checklist. Its main gap is actionability: it gives precise design tokens but no executable HTML/CSS scaffold or slide template, so archetype assembly stays at the prose level.
Suggestions
Add a minimal copy-paste HTML/CSS scaffold for one slide (substrate + scanline overlay + register strip) so the spec is executable, not just descriptive.
Provide one worked archetype example (e.g., the telemetry grid) as actual HTML/CSS rather than a prose description.
Optionally include a one-line build sequence (set substrate → add scanline → assemble archetypes → run pre-flight) to make the workflow explicit.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense and efficient — exact hex values, clamp() scales, and one-line rules with no padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows ('density over decoration'). | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Concrete specs abound ('border-radius: 0', 'display: grid; gap: 1px', '#E61919', 'clamp(56px, 7vw, 96px)'), but there is no executable HTML/CSS scaffold or slide example; the 11 archetypes are described in prose ('giant numeral or call-sign on the left, redaction bar above the title'), leaving actual assembly non-copy-paste. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The single task is unambiguous and the Pre-flight section is an explicit validation checklist (e.g., 'All border-radius is 0', 'Scanline overlay applied... opacity ≤ 0.08') serving as a completion gate for this non-destructive, single-purpose skill. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Self-contained and well-organized into clear sections (Hard rules, Banned, Required slide archetypes, Motion, Pre-flight) with no bundle files and no nested references — appropriate for a concise style spec. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |