Content
68%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured entry-point card: it correctly delegates authoring rules to the master skill and concentrates on the one thing unique to this card — wiring the xhs-pastel-card template and its shared runtime into a project — with unusually specific guidance on the asset-path pitfall. Main weaknesses are the absence of any post-copy validation step and inconsistent upstream path bases that make the external references harder to follow.
Suggestions
Add a validation step after the copy/rewrite recipes, e.g. "Verify: open index.html in a browser and confirm T cycles themes and arrow keys navigate slides before delivering."
Fix the path inconsistency — pick one base for the upstream (either "../html-ppt/SKILL.md" or "design-templates/html-ppt/SKILL.md") and use it consistently in the intro, step 1, and step 3.
Tighten step 3 by stating the pitfall once (relative URLs 404 after copying) and listing the four asset paths a single time in the recipe, rather than repeating them across the warning, Recipe A, and the closing guard.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and operational — exact file paths, class names (".tpl-xhs-pastel-card"), and the theme mechanism with no concept explanations — but step 3 pads a concept Claude already knows ("those parent-relative URLs no longer resolve and base.css... will 404 — meaning the deck never activates and slide navigation is dead") and repeats the four asset filenames three times, fitting 'Efficient; minor instances of over-explanation that could be trimmed'. Not score 3 because the trimming needed is localized to one step, and not score 5 because that step's redundancy is real. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Guidance is concrete and executable: copy "index.html and style.css", keep the ".tpl-xhs-pastel-card" body class, rewrite the four link/script tags to named project-local paths, swap themes via "<link id=\"theme-link\">", put notes in "<aside class=\"notes\">" — matching 'Mostly executable guidance; concrete code or commands with minor gaps'. The gap keeping it from 5 is a path inconsistency: the intro links "../html-ppt/SKILL.md" while steps 2–3 use "design-templates/html-ppt/..." for the same upstream, and none of these files ship in this skill's bundle, so a reader cannot tell exactly where the master files live. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The six steps are clearly numbered and ordered, and the riskiest operation (asset URL rewriting) has its failure mode spelled out plus a guard ("do not ship the upstream ../../../assets/... URLs verbatim"), but there is no validation checkpoint anywhere — nothing like "after rewriting, open index.html and confirm the keyboard runtime and slide navigation work". That matches 'Steps listed but validation gaps; sequence present but checkpoints missing or implicit' rather than score 4, which requires most checkpoints to be present. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is a well-signaled overview pointing one level deep to the master skill ("Read the master skill first... All authoring rules live in [html-ppt/SKILL.md]") and the full-decks catalog, keeping only entry-card-specific operational detail inline — matching 'Good structure; most content is appropriately placed; references mostly clear; minor organization gaps'. Not score 5 because the referenced files are not part of this skill's bundle and the two conflicting base paths ("../html-ppt/" vs "design-templates/html-ppt/") leave navigation slightly ambiguous. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |