Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A lean, well-organized body with a clear sequenced workflow and concrete output contract; the main weakness is that every file the body references (example.html, template.json, LICENSE, assets/deck-stage.js) is missing from the bundle, leaving the workflow's first step unactionable as shipped.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The ~60-line body is lean and efficient with no padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows — every section (At a glance, Best for, Avoid for, Workflow, Output contract, Source & license) earns its place. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete instruction-only guidance: "Clone `example.html` into the user's workspace as the working file", explicit don'ts (fonts, palette, layout grid, decorative elements), and a copy-paste-ready <artifact> output block. Minor gap: designing missing layouts "using the same fonts, palette, decorative vocabulary" gives no pointer to where those values are defined. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Six clearly sequenced steps with per-step specifics (clone, replace placeholders, preserve the system, duplicate layouts for length, design missing layouts in-system, keep the navigation runtime). Minor gap: no explicit validation/checkpoint step such as verifying the deck renders or page-number labels are updated. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is well-sectioned and signals one-level-deep references (example.html, template.json, ./LICENSE), but none of those files exist in the skill bundle — step 1 of the workflow depends on a missing example.html, and the referenced LICENSE and template.json are absent. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |