Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A tight, well-structured template-usage skill: the workflow is sequenced, the design-system guardrails are explicit, and the output contract is exact. Its weaknesses are the absence of any validation step before delivering the deck and references to bundle files (example.html, template.json, LICENSE, assets/deck-stage.js) that are not actually present.
Suggestions
Add a final validation step to the workflow, e.g., "Before delivering: confirm the artifact is a single self-contained HTML file, all page-number labels match the final slide count, and the deck opens with the shipped navigation intact."
Ship the files the body depends on (example.html, template.json, LICENSE, assets/deck-stage.js) or revise the workflow and license section to reference only what exists in the bundle.
Include one minimal slide-layout snippet (or a pointer to a real layouts reference file) so "replace placeholder content" has a concrete anchor instead of relying on the missing example.html.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and efficient — a one-line identity statement, terse at-a-glance/best-for/avoid-for sections, a six-step workflow, an exact output contract, and license attribution. No concept explanations Claude already knows and no padding; every token earns its place. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | The workflow is concrete and executable in form ("Clone `example.html`…", "Replace placeholder content…", "duplicate an existing slide of the most appropriate layout", exact `<artifact>` tag format) but has minor gaps: no sample slide markup to anchor the placeholder replacement, and the referenced source files cannot be inspected within this bundle. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Six clearly sequenced steps with explicit conditionals (duplicate layouts when there is more content, drop slides from the bottom when there is less, update page-number labels) and firm guardrails ("Never substitute fonts, recolor the palette…"). Not a 5 because there is no validation or verification step (e.g., confirm the deck renders or the artifact tag is well-formed) before delivering output. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Section organization is clean for a short body, but the body points at files that do not exist in the bundle — `example.html`, `template.json`, `./LICENSE`, and `assets/deck-stage.js` are all absent (no references/, scripts/, or assets/ directories ship with the skill). Navigation therefore leads to dangling references, and there is no README-style pointer to where the template's layouts or decorative vocabulary are documented. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |