Content
82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A lean, well-structured template skill: the workflow is concrete, the design constraints are explicit, and the output contract is copy-paste ready with no padding or over-explanation. The only meaningful gaps are the absence of a final validation step and the missing 'when to use' trigger guidance in the description, not the body.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The ~62-line body is lean and every section earns its place: an aesthetic one-liner, at-a-glance attributes, best-for/avoid-for, a 6-step workflow, the output contract, and license note. It assumes Claude's competence and explains nothing the model already knows — a clean fit for anchor 5. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Guidance is concrete and executable: 'Clone `example.html` into the user's workspace', 'Replace placeholder content', 'duplicate an existing slide of the most appropriate layout', plus a copy-paste-ready <artifact> output contract. It falls short of anchor 5 only because no sample slide markup or concrete design tokens (fonts, hex values) are shown inline. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The 6-step workflow is clearly sequenced with specific per-step instructions (what to preserve, how to grow or shrink the deck, what to leave intact). There is no explicit validation checkpoint, but the operation is neither destructive nor batch, so this is a minor gap at anchor 4 rather than a cap. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is well-organized with clear sections and all file references (`example.html`, `template.json`, `LICENSE`, `assets/deck-stage.js`) are one level deep and clearly signaled. It sits just below anchor 5 because it references bundle files whose presence is not verifiable in the skill directory and slightly exceeds the under-50-line simple-skill threshold. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |