Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is an efficient, well-structured overview with a clear workflow and a concrete output contract. Its main weaknesses are the missing bundle files the workflow instructs Claude to clone and read, and the absence of any validation/critic step before delivering the deck.
Suggestions
Ship the referenced bundle files (example.html, template.json, LICENSE, assets/deck-stage.js) alongside SKILL.md so steps 1 and 6 are executable as written.
Add an explicit validation step to the workflow, e.g., "Before emitting: re-open the deck, confirm every page-number label matches its index, no placeholder content remains, and the keyboard navigation runtime is intact; fix and re-check before delivery."
Since progressive disclosure relies entirely on the bundle, add a short file map (what each bundled file is for) so Claude knows what to read when, without loading everything up front.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and imperative throughout — the "At a glance" fact list, one-line "Best for"/"Avoid for" scoping, and terse workflow steps with zero concept explanations Claude already knows. Nothing is padded; every line ("Ivory ledger paper with all-black type", "Never substitute fonts, recolor the palette") adds template-specific information. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | The workflow is concrete and executable — "Clone `example.html` into the user's workspace", "duplicate an existing slide of the most appropriate layout", "Update page-number labels", plus a copy-paste-ready `<artifact>` output contract. Not a 5 because step 1 depends on an `example.html` that is not present in the bundle, and there is no concrete check of the finished deck. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Six well-sequenced steps cover clone → replace → preserve → resize → extend → ship, with light checkpoints ("Update page-number labels", "leave the navigation runtime as shipped"). It falls short of a 5 because there is no validation or critic pass (e.g., verify the deck renders, page labels are consistent) before emitting the artifact — though the operation is not destructive/batch, so no hard cap applies. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Sections are clearly organized and referenced files are well-signaled one level deep (`LICENSE`, `template.json`, `assets/deck-stage.js`), but the bundle as provided contains none of them — no `example.html`, `template.json`, `LICENSE`, or `assets/` exist alongside SKILL.md, so the core referenced material the workflow depends on is unreachable. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |