Content
65%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a tight, well-structured template overview with no wasted tokens and a clear sequenced workflow plus a copy-paste output contract. Its main gaps are the missing concrete slide-HTML example, no explicit verification step, and several referenced bundle files (example.html, LICENSE, template.json) that are absent.
Suggestions
Add a minimal concrete slide HTML snippet (or point to example.html with a labeled excerpt) so step 5's 'design it from scratch' has a copy-paste starting pattern.
Insert an explicit verification step in the workflow, e.g. 'Open the deck and confirm keyboard navigation and the 404-free deck-stage.js path both work before finishing.'
Either ship the referenced example.html, LICENSE, and template.json, or remove/adjust the references so the bundle structure matches what the body claims.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes competence — 'Editorial neo-brutalism with a single neon yellow accent on off-white paper' and tightly scoped sections (At a glance, Best for, Avoid for, Workflow, Output contract) with no padding or explanation of basic HTML/concepts, matching the 'lean and efficient; every token earns its place' anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Guidance is concrete (clone example.html and assets/, replace placeholders, preserve the design system, emit between <artifact> tags with a copy-paste template) but step 5 ('design it from scratch using the same fonts, palette...') is abstract and there is no concrete slide HTML/CSS example to copy, fitting 'some concrete guidance but incomplete'. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Six steps are clearly sequenced and the 404 footgun is called out, but there is no explicit validation/verification checkpoint (e.g. open the generated deck and confirm keyboard navigation works), matching 'steps listed but validation gaps; checkpoints missing or implicit'. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Content is well-organized into one-level-deep sections and assets/deck-stage.js is a real referenced file, but the workflow revolves around example.html and also references ./LICENSE and template.json — none of which exist in the bundle — so navigation is only partly sound, fitting 'some structure but could be better organized; references present but not clearly signaled'. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 9 / 12 Passed |