Content
63%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A compact, well-organized template skill: the workflow is concrete and correctly ordered, the output contract is exact, and the design-system preservation rules are specific and actionable. Its main weaknesses are that the core workflow depends on files (`example.html`, `template.json`, `LICENSE`) that are absent from the bundle it ships in, and there is no verification step confirming navigation works in the generated artifact.
Suggestions
Ship the referenced files or fix the references: 'Clone `example.html`', 'See `template.json` for the upstream metadata snapshot', and 'ships in this skill at LICENSE' all point to files that do not exist in this bundle, making the primary workflow step unactionable.
Add a final verification step to the workflow, e.g. 'After emitting the artifact, confirm the deck references `assets/deck-stage.js` correctly and keyboard navigation advances slides — if the path 404s, inline the runtime instead.'
Consolidate the navigation-runtime guidance (step 1's asset-path warning and step 6's 'keep the navigation runtime as shipped' cover the same concern) and trim the license paragraph, which repeats the redistribution requirement twice.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes competence: 'At a glance', 'Best for'/'Avoid for', a six-step workflow, and a concrete output contract, with no padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows. Only minor trimming candidates remain (step 6 partially restates step 1's runtime guidance, and the license paragraph is slightly repetitive), keeping it just below the every-token-earns-its-place anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | The workflow steps are concrete and well-specified (clone files, replace placeholders, preserve the design system, duplicate layouts, emit an <artifact> block with an exact identifier), but the primary action — 'Clone `example.html` AND the `assets/` folder' — references a file that is not present in this bundle, and `template.json` and `LICENSE` are likewise referenced but missing. The guidance has concrete steps with missing key details, which the fully-executable anchors require. | 3 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The six steps are clearly sequenced and ordered correctly (clone → replace content → preserve system → adjust length → design missing layouts → keep runtime), and step 1 includes a genuine failure-mode warning (the assets path will '404 in the generated artifact and navigation will silently break') with an inline alternative. What keeps it at 4 rather than 5 is the absence of any post-generation validation step, e.g. verifying keyboard navigation actually works in the emitted deck. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body has good section structure and is appropriately short, and its one runtime reference (`assets/deck-stage.js`) matches a real file in the bundle. However, scored against the actual bundle structure, three referenced paths — `example.html`, `template.json`, and `LICENSE` — do not exist in the skill directory, leaving the primary workflow and license-redistribution instructions pointing at dangling references. Good structure undermined by broken referenced paths fits the middle anchor. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 14 / 20 Passed |