ib-pitch-book

Open Design's investor pitch book: market map, moat, unit economics, and the ask — analyst-grade and diligence-ready. Built as a decision-grade fundraising pitch deck for growth-equity investors.

Quality

70%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

Securityby

Low

Low-risk findings worth noting

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./design-templates/ib-pitch-book/SKILL.md

Quality

Content

75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is a well-structured, mostly lean workflow with concrete CSS/layout guidance, an enumerated slide spine, and a compliance-aware evidence/citation regime. Its weaknesses are a missing example.html referenced file, a vague export step, and no explicit validate→fix→retry loop.

Suggestions

Ship the referenced example.html (or remove its citations in the resource map and Step 2) so signaled references all resolve to real bundle files.

Make Step 3 — Export concrete: specify the exact export command/path and a post-export validation checkpoint rather than deferring to 'daemon capabilities'.

Add an explicit feedback loop after the Step 2 self-check (e.g. 'If conventions.md self-check fails, fix index.html and re-run the check before proceeding to export').

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Conciseness	The body is lean and table/list-driven, avoids explaining concepts Claude already knows (DCF, tabular numerals are deferred to references), and assumes competence; minor framing prose ("Relationship to…" and the opening provenance paragraph) could be trimmed.	4 / 5
Actionability	Gives concrete, specific guidance — named CSS primitives (`.metric-strip`, `.chart-card`, `.compact-copy`), chart height ~150px, viewport checks at 1366×768 / 1440×900, an enumerated 10-slide spine, and a copy-template-to-index.html step — but the export step ("Follow Open Design's deck export path") is vague.	4 / 5
Workflow Clarity	Steps 0–3 are clearly sequenced with a P0/P1/P2 gate (references/checklist.md) and a self-check against conventions.md before declaring done, but there is no explicit validate→fix→retry feedback loop and the export step lacks a checkpoint.	4 / 5
Progressive Disclosure	SKILL.md is a clear overview with a resource-map tree and well-signaled one-level-deep references to references/*.md and assets/template.html; however the body repeatedly cites example.html (resource map and Step 2) which is not present in the bundle, a missing referenced path that prevents a 5.	4 / 5
	Total	16 / 20 Passed

Description

66%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is concrete and well-targeted at a distinct growth-equity fundraising niche, listing specific deck components and natural trigger terms. Its main weakness is the absence of an explicit "Use when…" trigger clause, which caps completeness.

Suggestions

Append an explicit 'Use when…' clause naming concrete triggers (e.g. 'Use when preparing a Series-A/growth-equity fundraising deck, investor pitch book, or board/M&A discussion materials').

Add common synonyms and file extensions to the trigger terms (e.g. 'investor deck', 'slide deck', '.pptx') to broaden natural-keyword coverage.

Lead with the action verb (e.g. 'Builds …') in third person so the core capability reads as a concrete action rather than a component list.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Specificity	Names the domain and several concrete deliverable components — "market map, moat, unit economics, and the ask" — alongside the action of building a "decision-grade fundraising pitch deck", giving comprehensive but component-level rather than action-level coverage.	4 / 5
Completeness	The "what" is clear (an analyst-grade pitch deck with named sections) but there is no "Use when…" clause or explicit trigger guidance, so per the judging guideline completeness is capped at 3 even though the audience implies the when.	3 / 5
Trigger Term Quality	Includes natural user-facing terms ("investor pitch book", "fundraising pitch deck", "growth-equity investors") with good coverage, though common synonyms like "investor deck", "slide deck", or file extensions are absent.	4 / 5
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk	The growth-equity / fundraising niche is fairly distinct, but overlap risk remains with sibling deck skills (e.g. html-ppt-pitch-deck called out in the body), keeping it just below a clear-niche 5.	4 / 5
	Total	15 / 20 Passed

Validation

93%

Warnings & errors only

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

Criteria	Description	Result
frontmatter_unknown_keys	Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata	Warning

	Total	15 / 16 Passed

Repository: nexu-io/open-design
Path: design-templates/ib-pitch-book/SKILL.md
Commit: 1a7a23d

Reviewed: about 5 hours ago

Table of Contents

Discovery Implementation Validation

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.