Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a tight, executable workflow: a structured prompt-composition checklist, a copy-paste-ready dispatcher command, and clear hard rules, with no padding. The main defects are the absence of a worked assembled-prompt example and a resource map that points to an example.html file that does not exist in the bundle.
Suggestions
Add a short worked example of a fully assembled prompt (e.g. filled-in values for model, aspect, and prompt string) so the happy path is demonstrated end-to-end.
Fix the resource map: either include example.html in the bundle or remove/adjust the entry so it does not advertise a file that does not exist.
Add a lightweight validation step after dispatch, e.g. check the returned JSON file name exists in the project folder before reporting the hand-off summary.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean throughout: a two-sentence framing, a 5-point prompt-assembly checklist, one annotated dispatcher command, a hand-off rule, and four hard rules. Every section adds non-obvious information and nothing explains concepts Claude already knows, matching the "lean and efficient; every token earns its place" anchor rather than the "minor instances of over-explanation" of 4. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | The dispatcher command is copy-paste ready with clearly annotated placeholders (e.g. `--model "<imageModel from metadata>"`, `--prompt "<the full assembled prompt from Step 1>"`) and the composition checklist gives concrete, ordered guidance. It falls short of anchor 5 because the body never shows a worked example of a fully assembled prompt string, so the most common case is not demonstrated end-to-end. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Steps 0-3 are clearly sequenced (read metadata, compose prompt, dispatch, hand off) with an explicit decision rule ("Ask only when the choice would materially change the requested result") and post-conditions (the command prints one line of JSON). Not a 5 because there is no validation checkpoint on the dispatcher output or the written file, and not a 3 because the sequence and most checkpoints are present. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is self-contained and well organized with clear sections, but the resource map advertises `example.html` ("← what the resulting card looks like in Examples") and no such bundle file exists in references/, scripts/, assets/, or the skill root. The sole referenced path is a dangling reference, which is more than the "minor organization gaps" of anchor 4. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |