Content
71%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, token-efficient contract with a concrete page spec and a genuine validation checklist — the strongest part of the skill. Its main defect is that its most important references (example.html and the kami DESIGN.md token spec) are missing from the bundle, leaving the guidance partially unactionable.
Suggestions
Ship the referenced bundle files (example.html, README.md, design-systems/kami/DESIGN.md) or inline the essential token table and one canonical HTML snippet into SKILL.md — progressive_disclosure and actionability both suffer because the declared source of truth is absent.
Close the workflow loop after step 4: add 'If any self-check item fails, fix it and re-run the checklist before delivering' to convert the checklist into a feedback loop.
Consolidate the triple statement of the core rules (What you get / Self-check / Boundaries) — state each rule once in the spec and let the checklist reference it, trimming repeated hex values and justifications.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense with information Claude does not already know — exact hex tokens (#f5f4ed, #1B365D), line-heights 1.10–1.55, per-language letter-spacing, the rgba double-paint rationale, breakpoints 1280/980/768/560 — and it assumes competence rather than explaining basics. It is not a 5 because the core rules (parchment background, ink-blue ≤ 5%, tabular-nums, solid-hex tags, no italic) are stated three times across 'What you get', the self-check, and 'Boundaries', which could be consolidated. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete, executable guidance throughout: a fully dimensioned page structure (96–106px display headline, 24px tabular-nums metric values), a language→font-stack table, a list of drop-in class primitives, data-od-id tagging instruction, and a 10-item self-check. It is not a 5 because the implementation is delegated to 'Mirror the structure of example.html' and to tokens in design-systems/kami/DESIGN.md, neither of which is present in the bundle — no executable HTML/CSS snippet is inlined, so the agent cannot complete the task from the skill alone. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The workflow contract is a clear four-step sequence (gather brief in two rounds → pick language stack → write index.html → self-check) with an explicit validation checkpoint: a 10-item self-check checklist before delivery. It is not a 5 because there is no feedback loop after the checklist (no 'if a check fails, fix and re-verify' instruction); this is a generative, non-destructive skill, so the missing-validation cap at 3 does not apply. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Structure and signaling are good — links are explicit, one level deep, and labeled ('Design system source of truth ... Read it before shipping'), with a 'Files in this skill' listing. But scored against the actual bundle, the referenced files do not exist: there is no README.md, no example.html, and no design-systems/kami/DESIGN.md, so the declared source of truth for every token and the canonical rendering are unreachable. That is why it sits at 3 rather than 4–5; it is above 2 because the SKILL.md itself is well organized and nothing is buried. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |