Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a compact, well-structured instruction set with specific, measurable UI requirements and an explicit pre-emission checklist gate. Its main gaps are the unspecified mechanics of the `<artifact>` wrapping step and the absence of a re-verify loop when checklist items fail.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence: no explanations of known concepts, terse bullet lists, and every section (workflow, output requirements, mobile constraints) earns its tokens. The only near-redundancy is the opening paragraph, but it adds the 'use when' guidance the frontmatter lacks, so nothing is trimmable padding. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Guidance is concrete and executable for an instruction-only skill: 'Input keyboards: `tel` for phone, `password` for password fields', 'Touch targets minimum 44px', 'Viewport: 375px wide', and enumerated output states (default, loading, error). It stops short of level 5 because the `<artifact>` wrapping step says only 'referencing the output file' without the exact mechanics, and no illustrative snippet is given. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The 5-step workflow has a clear sequence and an explicit validation checkpoint ('Checklist gate — verify P0 items before emitting `<artifact>`'). It falls short of level 5 because there is no feedback loop instructing what to do when a P0 item fails (fix and re-verify), only a one-way gate. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The single bundle file (`references/checklist.md`) exists, is one level deep, and is clearly signaled under 'Side Files' with its purpose ('P0/P1 acceptance criteria'); the acceptance checklist is correctly split out of the main body. Sections are well organized and the skill is under 50 lines, matching the simple-skill pattern for a top score. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |