Content
67%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a concise, well-structured overview that points to a real one-level reference (checklist.md) and includes an explicit validation gate before output. Its main weakness is actionability: it describes requirements concretely but offers no executable HTML/code scaffold.
Suggestions
Add a minimal executable HTML scaffold (viewport meta, input types, show/hide toggle) so guidance is copy-paste ready rather than inferred.
Make the checklist reference an inline link, e.g. 'verify P0 items in [checklist.md](references/checklist.md)', to strengthen navigation signaling.
Add an explicit error-recovery loop after the checklist gate (e.g. 'if any P0 fails, fix before emitting artifact').
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence; it lists concrete constraints and output requirements without explaining what login/HTML/mobile concepts are, with only minor padding. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Gives concrete guidance (viewport 375px, 44px touch targets, tel/password input types, specific UI states) but provides no executable code or HTML scaffold, leaving implementation details to inference. | 3 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear numbered sequence with an explicit 'Checklist gate — verify P0 items before emitting artifact' validation checkpoint, though error-recovery feedback after the gate is implicit rather than spelled out. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized sections with a single one-level-deep reference (references/checklist.md, which exists) clearly signaled under 'Side Files'; minor gap in that the checklist isn't linked inline where the gate is mentioned. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |