Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a tight, well-structured reference with an executable pipeline config and a built-in critique feedback loop; its main weakness is mild explanatory prose and a thin note on how plugins override the default.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence, leading with a spec citation and a compact jsonc block; the prose restating each stage's purpose could be trimmed slightly since the stage names are largely self-documenting. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | It provides a concrete, copy-paste-ready jsonc pipeline configuration with real atom identifiers and a real repeat/until condition, leaving only minor gaps around how a plugin actually declares its own od.pipeline. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The stages are clearly sequenced and the critique stage encodes an explicit feedback loop with a convergence checkpoint ('critique.score>=4 || iterations>=3'); it stops just short of step-by-step validation guidance. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | At under 50 lines with no need for external references, the content is well organized into clearly signaled sections (Default pipeline, Plugins that customise this scenario), satisfying the simple-skill exception. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |