Content
92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is lean, well-structured, and features an explicit validation feedback loop; its only weakness is actionability, where some concrete git/PR commands are implied rather than given.
Suggestions
Add the specific git commands for the commit/push step (e.g., the exact push invocation) to make step 7 copy-paste ready.
Specify how to inspect PR state in step 1 (e.g., the gh CLI commands for comments, reviews, and mergeability).
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean procedural guidance that assumes Claude's competence; no padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows, and every line earns its place. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete commands and constraints (e.g., 'pnpm guard', 'Forbid file edits and git write or coordination commands') but omits exact git commit/push and PR-inspection commands, leaving minor gaps. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clearly sequenced 7-step workflow with explicit validation (step 4) and an explicit fix-rerun-repeat feedback loop before commit/push, matching the score-5 anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | An under-50-line single-purpose skill with no external references and well-organized sections (Workflow, Monitoring cadence, Report), qualifying for the simple-skill score-5 exception. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |