Content
96%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A tightly written, highly executable instruction skill: dense with non-obvious constraints, a clear 7-step sequence, an explicit self-check validation stage, and a precise output contract. The only soft spot is progressive disclosure — everything is inline, which is appropriate for the size but leaves no reference structure.
Suggestions
Consider moving the detailed per-region layout spec (header bar, hero strip, ask bar, KPI row, grids) into a single reference file (e.g. references/layout.md), keeping SKILL.md as an overview plus workflow — this would earn the anchor-5 progressive disclosure pattern while trimming ~40 lines.
The 'Self-check' step could be sharpened into a verifiable checklist (e.g. a grep-able list of token names / data-od-id slugs to confirm) to make the validation loop even more concrete.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and directive throughout — 'Generate plausible data, never `Metric A / Metric B` placeholders', 'Sparklines: `<polyline>` with 10 points, no axes, ~16px tall', 'One sentence before the artifact, nothing after.' Every line carries a constraint Claude does not already know; no padding, no explanations of known concepts, no time-sensitive versions. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Guidance is fully executable: exact region list with `data-od-id` slugs, exact chart construction ('`<path>` for the curve, a second `<path>` with low-alpha fill', 'two `<circle>` annotation dots'), grid proportions (2/3 + 1/3), token rules, and a literal output contract skeleton ('<artifact identifier="social-media-dashboard" type="text/html" ...>'). Per the rubric's instruction-skill note, the absence of code blocks is not penalized when guidance is this specific. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clearly sequenced 7-step workflow (Read DESIGN.md → Identify → Generate data → Lay out → Write → Charts → Self-check) culminating in an explicit validation step: 'Self-check: Every color resolves to a DESIGN.md token... Numbers are internally consistent...'. The self-check acts as a concrete checkpoint, matching the anchor-5 pattern of sequence-plus-validation. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is self-contained with no bundle files (no references/, scripts/, or assets/ exist) and no dangling references, and its two sections (Workflow, Output contract) are clearly organized. It sits just below the anchor-5 pattern, which expects well-signaled one-level-deep references; at ~85 lines, the detailed per-region layout spec (header, hero, ask bar, grids) is the one block that could plausibly live in a separate reference file, a minor organization gap rather than a defect. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |