CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

swiss-user-research-video-template

Swiss-style user-research narrative template in warm-paper editorial aesthetics. Use when users ask for a premium research deck or story-first live artifact with minimalist typography, high-clarity layout, subtle motion, donut breakdowns, and keyboard/click navigation across slides in a single HTML file.

61

Quality

73%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./skills/swiss-user-research-video-template/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

71%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A lean, well-sequenced template workflow with concrete file paths, CSS tokens, and interaction specifics, plus a checklist-based validation step. Its main weaknesses are two references to files absent from the bundle (example.html, DESIGN.md) and the absence of an error-recovery loop after validation.

Suggestions

Fix broken bundle references: either ship the example.html listed in the resource map (and required by checklist.md's P0) or remove it, and clarify where DESIGN.md comes from or inline the required token values.

Add a short feedback loop after validation, e.g. 'If any P0 item fails, fix the template and re-run the checklist before emitting the artifact.'

Include a minimal token-mapping example (e.g. one line showing a DESIGN.md color mapped to --paper) to make step 1 fully executable without the missing file.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The ~45-line body is efficient with no explanation of concepts Claude already knows and every section is directive, but the opening flourish ('restrained micro-interactions that keep attention on the story') is minor over-explanation that could be trimmed, placing it just below the 5-anchor.

4 / 5

Actionability

Guidance is largely executable: specific paths ('assets/template.html', 'references/checklist.md'), concrete CSS variable names ('--paper', '--ink', '--muted'), key names ('ArrowLeft'/'ArrowRight'), and a copy-paste artifact XML block. The gap keeping it below 5 is that step 1 depends on 'DESIGN.md', which is not present in the bundle, and no token-mapping example is shown.

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

Six steps in a clear sequence ending with an explicit validation checkpoint ('Validate using references/checklist.md before output'). It falls short of the 5-anchor because there is no fix-and-revalidate feedback loop if the checklist fails.

4 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

References are one level deep, clearly signaled, and a resource map aids navigation, but the map lists an 'example.html' that does not exist in the bundle and the workflow references a missing 'DESIGN.md' (also implied by checklist.md's P0 item), so the actual bundle structure has broken navigation paths rather than the mostly-clear references of the 4-anchor.

3 / 5

Total

15

/

20

Passed

Description

75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A distinct, complete description with an explicit 'Use when' clause and concrete deliverable features. Its weaknesses are trigger phrasing that mixes natural user terms with designer jargon, and a capability statement framed as stylistic attributes with mild buzzword padding rather than concrete actions.

Suggestions

Replace jargon-heavy trigger phrases like 'warm-paper editorial aesthetics' and 'story-first live artifact' with terms a user would naturally say, e.g. 'user research presentation', 'UX research slides', or 'donut chart'.

Trim buzzword padding ('premium', 'story-first') and restate the capability as concrete actions, e.g. 'Builds a single-file HTML slide deck for user research findings, with a participant donut chart and keyboard navigation'.

Add common synonyms or file extensions users might mention (e.g. 'research report', 'presentation', 'deck') to broaden natural trigger coverage.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

The description names a clear domain ('Swiss-style user-research narrative template') and concrete deliverable features ('donut breakdowns, and keyboard/click navigation across slides in a single HTML file'), but these are stylistic attributes rather than the multiple concrete actions of the 4/5 anchors, and phrases like 'premium research deck' and 'story-first live artifact' lean on buzzword padding.

3 / 5

Completeness

Both questions are explicitly answered: the 'what' ('Swiss-style user-research narrative template in warm-paper editorial aesthetics... a single HTML file') and a concrete 'Use when users ask for a premium research deck or story-first live artifact with minimalist typography, high-clarity layout, subtle motion, donut breakdowns, and keyboard/click navigation' trigger clause, matching the top anchor.

5 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Some natural keywords are present ('research deck', 'user-research', 'slides', 'single HTML file'), but 'warm-paper editorial aesthetics' and 'story-first live artifact' are designer jargon users would not naturally say, and common synonyms like 'presentation', 'UX research', or 'donut chart' are missing, matching the 'some relevant keywords but missing common variations' anchor.

3 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

'Swiss-style user-research narrative template' with 'warm-paper' aesthetics and donut/slide-navigation specifics carves out a clear niche that would rarely collide with generic document or presentation skills, matching the 'clear niche with distinct triggers' anchor.

5 / 5

Total

16

/

20

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository
nexu-io/open-design
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.