Content
65%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is concise and well-organized, but actionability and workflow_clarity lack executable commands and a verification step, and the referenced 'source/' bundle is absent, which undermines progressive disclosure.
Suggestions
Add the concrete render command for the html-video / HyperFrames renderer in step 4 so the workflow is copy-paste executable.
Insert a verification checkpoint after rendering (e.g. 'Confirm MP4 output exists and plays at 16:9 / 15s / 30fps before returning to the user').
Ship the referenced 'source/' bundle (at minimum 'source/index.html') so the workflow's file references resolve, or remove the references if the bundle is not provided.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The ~21-line body is lean, assumes Claude's knowledge (no explanation of GSAP/HTML/CSS), and each line (render specs, 'Best for', workflow, attribution) earns its place without padding. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Guidance is concrete in places (explicit 'source/index.html', named 'html-video / HyperFrames renderer') but step 4 gives no executable render command and step 2 does not specify where/how copy is edited, leaving key details missing for an instruction-only skill. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The four steps are clearly sequenced, but no validation or verification checkpoint (e.g. confirm the MP4 rendered correctly) is present, which is a gap for a render workflow. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is well-sectioned and signals a one-level-deep reference to 'source/index.html', but the referenced 'source/' bundle directory does not exist in the skill, so the disclosed material is missing and navigation is broken. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 9 / 12 Passed |