CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

weread-year-in-review-video-template

WeRead-inspired HyperFrames video template for vertical annual reading reports, personal reading dashboards, book-note recaps, and shareable year-in-review stories. Use when users want a 9:16 HTML-to-MP4 reading report with warm paper texture, editorial Chinese typography, book-page metaphors, data highlights, and deterministic motion.

70

Quality

86%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Low

Low-risk findings worth noting

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A well-structured, lean template skill body that appropriately pushes detail into the asset and a one-level-deep checklist reference. Actionability and workflow clarity sit at 4 because the editable code is in the asset and the validation feedback loop is implicit rather than spelled out.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

Lean body (overview, resource map, 7-step workflow, output contract) that assumes Claude's competence—no padding explaining what 9:16, HyperFrames, or reading reports are—and every token earns its place.

5 / 5

Actionability

Concrete commands (copy `assets/template.html` to `index.html`), an enumerated list of REPORT fields to replace, and specific attribute names (`data-start`, `data-duration`, `data-track-index`); the minor gap is that the actual editable HTML and REPORT object structure live in the asset rather than inline, so it falls just short of copy-paste-ready score-5 guidance.

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

A clear 7-step sequence with an explicit validation checkpoint (step 7: "Validate against `references/checklist.md` before emitting") and a referenced checklist, but it lacks the explicit "if validation fails, fix and re-validate" feedback loop shown in the score-5 anchor.

4 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

Clear overview plus a resource map, with the heavy template content split into `assets/template.html` and validation detail in `references/checklist.md` (both verified to exist), one level deep and clearly signaled in step 7—easy to navigate.

5 / 5

Total

18

/

20

Passed

Description

87%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A strong, specific description that clearly answers both what the skill produces and when to use it, with a distinctive niche and minimal conflict risk. Verb framing is slightly less action-oriented than ideal, keeping specificity and trigger-term quality at 4 rather than 5.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists several concrete deliverable types (annual reading reports, dashboards, book-note recaps, year-in-review stories) and concrete visual/technical attributes (9:16 HTML-to-MP4, warm paper texture, editorial Chinese typography, deterministic motion), but the "template for X" framing uses fewer action verbs than the score-5 anchor's "Extract… fill… merge… convert".

4 / 5

Completeness

Explicitly states both what ("WeRead-inspired HyperFrames video template for vertical annual reading reports…") and when ("Use when users want a 9:16 HTML-to-MP4 reading report…") with concrete trigger phrases, matching the score-5 anchor pattern.

5 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Includes natural terms with synonyms ("annual reading reports", "year-in-review stories", "reading report", "reading dashboards", "book-note recaps") plus the "WeRead" brand; good coverage though a few natural variations (e.g. Chinese trigger phrases) live in `triggers` rather than the description, and file extensions are n/a for a video template.

4 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Occupies a clear niche (WeRead year-in-review vertical video) with highly distinct triggers and minimal conflict risk with other skills.

5 / 5

Total

18

/

20

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository
nexu-io/open-design
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.