Content
82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-organized, highly actionable skill body: executable commands throughout, a clear 3-phase workflow with quality thresholds and validation steps, and script documentation that matches the actual bundle. The main improvements are removing the redundant 'Next Steps After Discovery' section and moving detailed script option docs into a reference file.
Suggestions
Delete or merge the 'Next Steps After Discovery' section — it repeats Phase 3's extract/validate/check-duplicates/commit guidance verbatim.
Move the per-script option lists into a references/ file (e.g. references/scripts.md) and keep only one canonical example per script in SKILL.md.
Add an explicit feedback loop for failures, e.g. 'If the validator or similarity checker reports issues, fix the pattern and re-run before committing'.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dominated by copy-paste commands with no concept explanations Claude already knows, so it largely respects token budget. It loses a point for redundancy: the 'Next Steps After Discovery' numbered list restates Phase 3 almost verbatim, and the 'Quick Start' invocation list duplicates the frontmatter description. Not 5 ('every token earns its place') because of that duplicated guidance; not 3 since the padding is localized rather than pervasive. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Every phase is backed by fully executable commands with flags, defaults, and worked examples ('python scripts/arxiv_scanner.py --days=30 --max-results=50 --export-md results.md'), and the Script Reference documents all three bundled scripts (verified present in scripts/) with complete option lists. This matches 'Fully executable; copy-paste ready code or commands; specific examples cover the common cases'. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The 3-phase workflow is clearly sequenced with explicit thresholds (score >= 7.0) and validation checkpoints ('Run the similarity checker before committing', 'Run the validator to ensure pattern quality'), matching 'Clear sequence with most checkpoints present'. It falls short of 5 because there is no explicit feedback loop — no instruction for what to do when validation fails or a flagged duplicate needs resolving. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Good structure: quick start, 3-phase workflow, and a Script Reference section covering the three real bundled scripts; the external pointer '(see RUBRIC.md for details)' is one level deep and clearly signaled. It is not 5 because the full option documentation for all three scripts is inlined in SKILL.md rather than split into a references/ file, and there are no well-signaled reference files for the scoring rubric details beyond the single RUBRIC.md mention. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |