Content
82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-architected dispatch skill: executable commands for all six modes, a disciplined three-layer wizard that asks only high-risk questions, and explicit routing boundaries against sibling skills. The main defects are routing information repeated in four places and — more seriously — that every deep-dive pointer targets references/trivy.md, which is absent from the bundle, leaving bootstrap, SARIF upload, and Trivy Operator deployment guidance unresolved.
Suggestions
Ship references/trivy.md in the bundle: the body instructs 'Read references/trivy.md before responding' and points to it from every mode section, but no references/ directory exists, so bootstrap steps, auth, SARIF upload, .trivyignore patterns, and the Trivy Operator Flux HelmRelease deployment are dead ends.
State the routing table once (the 'Ownership boundary (enforced at the menu)' table) and have wizard Layer 1, the 'Intent classification' table, and 'Cross-references' refer to it instead of restating the checkov/kyverno/supply-chain hand-offs four times.
Close the feedback loop after a failing CI gate — e.g., summarize the HIGH/CRITICAL findings that tripped '--exit-code 1' and offer the expiry-dated .trivyignore template — so the workflow ends in an action rather than a bare non-zero exit.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense and functional — tables and command blocks with no explanation of concepts Claude already knows — but the checkov/kyverno/supply-chain routing is stated four times (the 'Ownership boundary (enforced at the menu)' table, wizard Layer 1, the 'Intent classification' table, and 'Cross-references'), and the mode list appears in both the dispatch table and the per-mode sections. Efficient with trimmable duplication fits anchor 4 ('minor instances of over-explanation that could be trimmed' / could be tightened); anchor 5's 'every token earns its place' is not met, and anchor 3 would require unnecessary explanation, which is absent. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Every mode ships a complete, copy-paste-ready command — e.g. 'trivy image --severity HIGH,CRITICAL --exit-code 1 --format table <image-ref>' and 'trivy fs --scanners vuln,secret,license --severity HIGH,CRITICAL --exit-code 1 .' — the wizard supplies literal prompt text with recommended defaults, and the ask/never-ask tables give exact question wording. Executable commands cover all the common cases, matching anchor 5; anchor 4's 'minor gaps' would only fit if a common case lacked inline guidance, and none does (the advanced Operator deployment is deliberately deferred to the reference). | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Sequencing is explicit — 'Before asking any question, classify from the user's free-text request', then mode dispatch, then the numbered three-layer wizard — with pre-flight checkpoints (private-registry credential prompt, '> 2 GB' pull warning, '.trivyignore has entries without expiry' check) and the '--exit-code 1' pass/fail gate. Anchor 4 fits: most checkpoints are present, but there is no post-run feedback loop (e.g., what to do when the CI gate fails or how to present findings to the user), so anchor 5's 'feedback loops for error recovery' is not fully met. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The written design matches the anchor-5 pattern — a concise overview with clearly signaled, one-level-deep, per-mode pointers ('Reference: references/trivy.md → Mode: image — bootstrap, auth, output formats, SARIF, .trivyignore') — but the actual bundle contains no references/ directory, so 'Read references/trivy.md before responding' and the seven pointers to that file resolve to nothing. Scored against the actual bundle structure per the judging guidelines, this drops to anchor 4 ('references mostly clear; minor organization gaps'), since navigation leads to a dead end. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |