Content
85%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A tight, well-organized instruction-only skill with clear sequencing and an explicit validation checkpoint. Its one gap is the absence of a concrete example engineered prompt, which keeps actionability from the top level.
Suggestions
Add one short worked example of a finished 15-second Seedance prompt (with @video/@image bindings and the 5-part structure filled in) so the abstract structure has a concrete, copyable model.
Show a brief before/after of the Review Fallback strengthening a vague prompt, to make the review→strengthen feedback loop explicit.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean bullet-based body (~26 lines) with no padding and no explanation of concepts Claude already knows; every line carries a rule, matching the 'lean and efficient' anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Guidance is concrete and specific (exact @video/@image labeling, the V2V extension wording, the 5-part structure, the review checklist), but no worked example of a finished engineered prompt is shown, leaving a key actionable artifact missing. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The numbered 5-step Prompt Structure plus the explicit pre-generation Review Fallback checkpoint ('Before generation, check ... If any are weak, strengthen them') give a clear sequence with an explicit validation step. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | A sub-50-line skill with no bundle files and well-organized section headers; per the rubric's simple-skills note, well-organized sections alone warrant a 3 here. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |