CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

novu-dashboard-workflows

Author step content for Novu workflows defined in the Dashboard or generated/edited via the Novu MCP. Use when filling in step controls (subject, body, editorType, headers, body, conditions) for email, in-app, sms, push, chat, delay, digest, throttle, or HTTP Request steps.

66

Quality

81%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A well-structured, lean, and actionable skill body that excels at progressive disclosure via a clean reference-dispatch table and a concrete pitfalls checklist. Its only soft spots are a few generic guideline lines and the absence of an explicit validation/feedback loop or full in-body step templates.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is dense and high-signal (Liquid syntax, the Block Editor bare-variable exception, responseBodySchema rules, right/wrong pitfalls) with no padding of concepts Claude already knows, but a few generic guideline lines ("Keep content consistent with other workflow steps", "Modify the content according to the user's intent") could be trimmed, keeping it just below the lean anchor 5.

4 / 5

Actionability

Provides concrete, executable snippets with explicit right/wrong examples ("`payload.actionUrl`" vs "`{{ payload.actionUrl }}`", use `[]` not `[{ "key": "", "value": "" }]`) and Liquid/HTTP-reference syntax, but complete copy-paste-ready step templates live in the reference files rather than the main body, leaving minor gaps versus the fully-executable anchor 5.

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

The dispatch is unambiguous (step-type table maps each type to its reference with a "Use it for" column) and the Common Pitfalls section acts as a verification checklist, but there is no explicit numbered sequence or formal validate-then-fix feedback loop, so it falls below the explicit-checkpoint anchor 5; no destructive/batch cap applies since step-content authoring is not destructive.

4 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

A clear overview with a well-signaled one-level-deep reference table (all ten referenced files exist in ./references/), general guidelines kept inline while step-specific detail is split into per-type files, plus a See-Also section for sibling skills — matching the clear-overview anchor 5 with easy navigation.

5 / 5

Total

17

/

20

Passed

Description

83%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A strong, specific description that clearly states both what it does and when to use it, with comprehensive enumeration of step types and controls. It is held back from top marks only by a narrow action-verb set, missing casual synonyms, and minor overlap risk within the Novu skill family.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists several specific controls ("subject, body, editorType, headers, body, conditions") and comprehensively enumerates all ten step types ("email, in-app, sms, push, chat, delay, digest, throttle, or HTTP Request"), but the action verbs are narrow ("Author"/"filling in") rather than multiple distinct actions, so it sits just below the comprehensive multi-action anchor 5.

4 / 5

Completeness

Explicitly answers both what ("Author step content for Novu workflows defined in the Dashboard or generated/edited via the Novu MCP") and when ("Use when filling in step controls ... for [step types]") with concrete trigger phrases, matching the anchor-5 example pattern exactly.

5 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Strong domain keyword coverage across all channels and control names ("email, in-app, sms, push, chat, delay, digest, throttle, HTTP Request", "subject, body, editorType, headers, conditions") plus "Novu", "Dashboard", "MCP", but lacks common synonyms a user might say ("notification", "message", "template", "webhook"), keeping it below the synonym-inclusive anchor 5.

4 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Has a clear niche (Dashboard/MCP step-content controls) distinct from sibling skills, but the "See Also" family (design-workflow, framework-integration, trigger-notification) signals minor overlap risk with closely related Novu skills, so it does not reach the minimal-conflict anchor 5.

4 / 5

Total

17

/

20

Passed

Validation

87%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation14 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

relative_links

Relative link issues: 5 suspicious

Warning

Total

14

/

16

Passed

Repository
novuhq/novu
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.